Previous Page  93 / 119 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 119 Next Page
Page Background

Emerging Concepts in Ion Channel Biophysics

Poster Abstracts

88 

68-POS

Board 68

Regulation of Class Ib anti-Arrhythmic Drug Block by the Cardiac Na

+

Channel Voltage-

Sensing Domains

Wandi Zhu,

Jonathan R. Silva

.

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Background: Clinical studies have shown that class I anti-arrhythmics are helpful in a subset of

patients while being lethal in others. For example, patients with Long QT mutations respond

differently to mexiletine, a class Ib anti-arrhythmic. We observed the conformational dynamics

of different cardiac Na

+

channel (NaV1.5) domains to discover characteristics that facilitate or

prevent effective mexiletine block.

Methods: NaV1.5 contains four domains (DI-DIV), each with a voltage-sensing domain (VSD).

We previously created four DNA constructs that contain a cysteine within a single VSD.

Channels were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and cysteines were labeled with fluorophores.

Ionic current and VSD-tracking fluorescence emission were simultaneously recorded.

Results: Mexiletine binding to WT channels stabilizes the DIII-VSD in the activated

conformation without affecting the other domains. LQT3 mutant channels show variable

mexiletine sensitivity (R1626P>P1332L>WT=S941N>M1652R). These mutants also show

varying DIII-VSD activation voltage-dependence, despite the distal locations of the mutations.

The DIII-VSD activation shift strongly correlates with mexiletine sensitivity (QT-shortening).

The highly-sensitive mutations stabilize the activated DIII-VSD, while the insensitive mutation

destabilizes it. Thus, an activated DIII-VSD facilitates mexiletine blockade. To test this

hypothesis, we assessed 13 additional mutations, and quantified gating parameters such as

conductance voltage-dependence, inactivation, DIII-VSD activation and drug block. A partial

least square regression (PLSR) model showed that DIII-VSD activation and inactivation

represent components that regulate drug block.

Conclusion: Traditionally, channel activation and inactivation were linked to Class-Ib drug

block. We propose a novel mechanism where DIII-VSD conformation facilitates or impairs

block. By assessing how mutations affect the DIII-VSD, we expect to predict whether a patient

will respond to mexiletine. This mechanism could also be utilized to develop a new type of

combination therapy by stabilizing the DIII-VSD activated state to increase the efficacy of class-

Ib drugs.