Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  193 / 1143 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 193 / 1143 Next Page
Page Background

c) Project activities

Ensure the HAZOP is properly documented with consideration given to later SIL assessment

activities. A clear method of tracking from HAZOP hazard right thought all later phases is

essential.

Consider in design likely high risk (high SIL) areas to avoid frequent testing that impacts

operations, e.g. redundancy of valves, to avoid later design changes.

Equipment and package specifications must consider any potential FS requirements to avoid

later disputes with suppliers. Note the new and more onerous requirements for suppliers

related to their FS management in the latest edition of IEC61511

Ensure design change management procedures reflect FS requirements at the correct life

cycle stage

7) KEY MESSAGES

Some key messages I would like you to take from this presentation are as follows.

Consider the FSM plan from the very beginning, even bid or FEED

Make sure whoever is responsible for FS really understands both the technicalities of the

standard and how projects work. An academic approach is of little value if it conflicts with

the prime drivers of the project, schedule and cost.

The FS management plan is the key document and the first issue must be very early

Contractual disputes between Operator, EPC and suppliers can become a major obstacle to a

successful implementation. Clear scope definition is important here.

Adopt a semi-continuous FSA strategy with the right (pragmatic) assessor. Go for a person,

rather than a company.

L Blackmore

C Eng. F Inst MC, FIET, TUV FS Expert