![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0338.png)
Original Research—Laryngology and Neurolaryngology
Esophageal Visualization as an Adjunct
to the Videofluoroscopic Study of
Swallowing
Otolaryngology–
Head and Neck Surgery
2015, Vol. 152(3) 488–493
!
American Academy of
Otolaryngology—Head and Neck
Surgery Foundation 2015
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/0194599814565599
http://otojournal.orgAnna Miles, PhD
1
, Jessica McMillan, MSc
1
, Katie Ward, MSc
2
, and
Jacqui Allen, MBChB, FRACS
1,2
No sponsorships or competing interests have been disclosed for this article.
Abstract
Objective
. Complaints of dysphagia for solids lead to speech-
language pathology (SLP) referral. Yet many of these patients
are later diagnosed with esophageal rather than oropharyn-
geal dysphagia. Fluoroscopic screening involving the oro-
pharynx alone fails to identify these patients. The aim of this
study was to investigate the prevalence of esophageal
abnormalities in an SLP-led videofluoroscopic study of swal-
lowing (VFSS) clinic.
Study Design
. Prospective, observational study.
Setting
. Radiology suite, public hospital.
Subjects and Methods
. In total, 111 consecutive mixed-
etiology patients referred to the clinic by otorhinolaryngol-
ogy (ORL) (59) or by a speech-language pathologist (52)
were recruited. A VFSS was performed according to proto-
col, and at completion, esophageal visualization (in anterior-
posterior plane) was performed by administration of a large
liquid barium bolus and a barium capsule. All VFSS record-
ings were analyzed using objective digital measures of timing
and displacement.
Results
. Sixty-eight percent of patients had an abnormal eso-
phageal transit. One-third of those referred presented
exclusively with esophageal abnormalities, while one-third
had both oropharyngeal and esophageal abnormalities. Oral
abnormalities, reduced pharyngoesophageal segment maxi-
mum opening (PESmax), and increasing age were significantly
associated with esophageal abnormalities.
Conclusion
. Fluoroscopic evaluation of the pharynx alone,
without esophageal review, risks incomplete diagnosis of
patients with esophageal disorders. Using esophageal visuali-
zation allows timely referral for further investigation by
appropriate medical specialties, avoiding incomplete manage-
ment of patients with dysphagia.
Keywords
deglutition, deglutition disorders, dysphagia, esophageal visua-
lization, speech-language pathology, otorhinolaryngology
Received August 13, 2014; revised October 23, 2014; accepted
December 4, 2014.
A
ssociations between oropharyngeal abnormalities
and esophageal abnormalities are poorly understood
but well documented.
1-3
Oropharyngeal alterations
have been reported in patients with gastroesophageal reflux
disease.
4
Neurologic diseases such as Parkinson disease
5,6
and systemic conditions such as scleroderma
7
lead to both
oropharyngeal and esophageal abnormalities. In a recent
study using high-resolution manometry, O’Rourke and col-
leagues
8
describe a variety of esophageal alterations during
voluntary pharyngeal maneuvers (effortful swallow and
Mendelsohn), adding to the theory that changing one point
in the swallowing system can lead to positive or negative
changes elsewhere. In addition, patient accuracy in locating
the level of bolus holdup has been shown to be poor, with
patients often indicating the cervical region or levels more
proximal than the true site of bolus stasis, particularly when
this occurs in the esophagus.
1,9,10
Smith and colleagues
10
reported 57% of respondents located a solid bolus impacted
at a distal esophageal ring to the level of the sternal notch.
Complaints of dysphagia for solids regularly lead to
speech-language pathology (SLP) referral rather than gastroen-
terology or otorhinolaryngology (ORL). Traditionally, SLP-led
videofluoroscopic study of swallowing (VFSS) has assessed
the oropharynx exclusively, even when symptoms might sug-
gest esophageal complaints. This results in failure to identify
patients with esophageal problems. These patients are sent
home with no diagnosis and either continue to manage their
symptoms alone or undergo a variety of other diagnostic tests
over a prolonged period of time before reaching correct diag-
nosis and treatment. An esophageal screen was described and
validated by Allen and colleagues in 2012.
11
They compared
fluid esophageal screens with full esophagrams in 74 mixed-
1
The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
2
Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
Corresponding Author:
Anna Miles, PhD, Speech Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag
92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Email:
a.miles@auckland.ac.nzReprinted by permission of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 152(3):488-493.
113