![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page1158.jpg)
1. Viewing technique
→
PET-MIP (LK?) -> PET volume -> CT
2. Reading criteria
→
visibility in the MIP leading
3. How to deal with equivocal findings
→
include Prä-Test Probability
(Giraud et al.)
in doubt: report positively
(RT-context!)
1. LN station infiltrated by primary
→
report positively
2. Anatomical allocation
→
use atlas!
3. Bulky disease
→
report all affected LN stations
Post-study: Measurable effect of harmonisation
near PT remote
near PT remote
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
CT
PET
Kappa values infiltrating primary
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
CT
PET
bulk
no bulk
bulk
no bulk
Kappa values bulk/no bulk
near PT remote
near PT remote
diagnostic
anatomic