Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1158 / 1241 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1158 / 1241 Next Page
Page Background

1. Viewing technique

PET-MIP (LK?) -> PET volume -> CT

2. Reading criteria

visibility in the MIP leading

3. How to deal with equivocal findings

include Prä-Test Probability

(Giraud et al.)

in doubt: report positively

(RT-context!)

1. LN station infiltrated by primary

report positively

2. Anatomical allocation

use atlas!

3. Bulky disease

report all affected LN stations

Post-study: Measurable effect of harmonisation

near PT remote

near PT remote

0,00

0,10

0,20

0,30

0,40

0,50

0,60

0,70

CT

PET

Kappa values infiltrating primary

0,00

0,10

0,20

0,30

0,40

0,50

0,60

0,70

0,80

CT

PET

bulk

no bulk

bulk

no bulk

Kappa values bulk/no bulk

near PT remote

near PT remote

diagnostic

anatomic