I N S I D E L A B O R A T O R Y M A N A G E M E N T
■
© A O A C I N T E R N A T I O N A L
■
M A Y / J U N E 2 0 1 5
10
AOAC NEWS
ERP of the Year. The winner
is selected by a 2/3 vote. If
necessary, the OMB chair
may cast the tie-breaking
vote.
Award
An appropriate letter of
appreciation and thanks is
sent to the members of the
ERP. The panel is announced
at the appropriate session of
the AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Annual Meeting, with pre-
sentation of an award. All
panelists are acknowledged
at the Annual Meeting, and
receive an award and a
letter of appreciation. The
name of the ERP, with sup-
porting story, is announced
in ILM.
INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT
AWARDS
Technical Service Award
More than one volunteer
may be selected in this cate-
gory each year. In each case,
the area of expertise should
be noted at the time of pre-
sentation of the award.
Selection Criteria
The minimum criteria for
selection are:
(
1)
Demonstrates timely,
competent, and continuous
service in an exemplary
manner to a stakeholder
panel, ERP, working group,
Section, AOAC analytical
community, committee, and/
or the OMB.
(2)
Donates service
within the 3 years prior to
nomination.
(3)
Provides outstanding
expert guidance and support
in all technical aspects as
needed and requested.
Additional support for
selection is exemplary per-
formance in one or more of
the following areas:
(1)
Provides guidance
on safety, statistical, tech-
nical matters, or process
expertise.
(2)
Instrumental in
developing, modifying, or
validating a high-quality
method for publication in the
Official Methods of Analysis.
(3)
Communicates
related activities through
the appropriate channels,
either through the panel/
group/community chairs,
Committee on Statistics
or Safety, Chief Scientific
Officer, or other staff
designees.
(4)
Contributes
significantly to AOAC
INTERNATIONAL over a
period of years with other
accomplishments related to
his/her area of expertise (e.g.,
symposium presentations,
poster presentations, publica-
tions, workshops, meetings).
(5)
Contributes to
the development and
improvement of AOAC
INTERNATIONAL guidelines,
Official Methods, or statis-
tics or safety programs.
(6)
Helps guide AOAC in
the decision-making process
to ensure the organization is
a leader in the field of ana-
lytical science.
Selection Process
(1)
The OMB solicits the
chairs of the stakeholder
panels, ERPs, working
groups, committees, AOAC
analytical communities,
and the Association mem-
bership for nominees.
Recommendations based on
input from anyone qualified
to discuss the contribu-
tion of the nominee can be
submitted.
(2)
Written recommen-
dations and supporting
information must be submit-
ted to the OMB chair. The
OMB chair distributes the
information to the members
of the OMB.
(3)
The OMB selects the
winner(s) of the Technical
Service Award by a 2/3 vote.
If necessary, the OMB chair
may cast the tie-breaking
vote.
Award
An appropriate letter
of appreciation and thanks
is sent to the recipient(s)
of the award. The winner
is announced at the appro-
priate session of the AOAC
INTERNATIONAL Annual
Meeting, with presentation
of an award. The recipient(s)
is acknowledged at the
Annual Meeting, and receive
an award and a letter of
appreciation. The name of
the winner, with supporting
story, is announced in the
ILM.
Method of the Year
The OMB may select
more than one method in
this category each year.
Selection Criteria
The minimum criteria for
selection are:
(1)
The method must
have been approved for First
or Final Action within the
last 3 years.
(2)
Generally, some
unique or particularly note-
worthy aspect of the method
is highlighted as making it
worthy of the award, such
as innovative technology
or application, breadth of
applicability, critical need,
difficult analysis, and/or
range of collaborators.
(3)
The method demon-
strates significant merit in
scope or is an innovative
approach to an analytical
problem.
Selection Process
(1)
AOAC staff lists all
eligible methods for consid-
eration and forwards that
list with supporting docu-
mentation [e.g., ERP chair
recommendation(s)] to the
chair of the OMB.
(2)
The OMB chair for-
wards the list, along with
any supporting information,
to the members of the OMB.
(3)
The OMB selects
the Method of the Year. The
winner is selected by 2/3
vote. If necessary, the OMB
chair may cast the tie-break-
ing vote.
Award
An appropriate letter
of appreciation and thanks
is sent to the author(s) of
the winning method. The
corresponding author is
announced at the appro-
priate session of the AOAC
INTERNATIONAL Annual
Meeting, with presentation
of an award. All authors are
acknowledged at the Annual
Meeting, and receive an
award and a letter of appre-
ciation. The name of the
winner(s), with supporting
story, is announced in the
ILM.
Conclusion
Winners will be chosen
at an upcoming OMB meet-
ing in (DATE?), and awards
will be presented at the
129th AOAC Annual Meeting
in Los Angeles, California,
USA.
For more information on
the OMB volunteer awards,
contact
Deborah McKenzie,
senior director, standards
development, at dmckenzie@
aoac.org.
■
Official Methods
SM
Program Awards Recognizes Volunteer Commitment and Leadership
Continued from page 9