Previous Page  165 / 208 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 165 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

General discussion

163

8

Protein

Recent large prospective studies have particularly stressed the importance of a high total (but

predominantly enteral) protein intake in critically ill children and adults due to its association

with decreased mortality and reduced length of stay, independently of caloric intake

23,60,61

.

However, co-occurrence of high protein intake and improved outcome does not imply

causation. Also, as with the association between higher caloric intake and improved outcome,

protein intake goals vary widely between PICUs (Chapter 2). Administration of protein enriched

enteral formulas in critically ill children consistently increases total protein synthesis/balance

and levels of amino acids

62-66

. However, relations between these surrogate endpoints and

clinically relevant outcomes are often non-existent or weak. Sometimes surrogate endpoints

even suggest a benefit whereas the clinical outcomes indicate harm (Chapter 5 and 7).

Cumulative amino acid dose early during ICU stay was associated with delayed recovery in

a post-hoc analysis of the EPaNIC trial

19

. Some amino acids, such as leucine, exert a primary

anabolic effect in skeletal muscle and inhibit the initiating step of autophagy

67

by activation

of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin)

68

, thereby reducing tolerance to oxidative stress,

increasing risk for organ failure (especially liver and kidney) and cell death, eventually resulting

in worse clinical outcome

69

.

Lipids

Due to a lack of evidence, the optimal amount of lipid administration in critically ill children

remains unclear, reflected by a wide range in parenteral lipid targets (from below 1.5 to

above 3.5 g/kg/day) (Chapter 2). Provision of saturated fatty acids is known to provoke more

endoplasmatic reticulum (ER) stress and inflammation in liver and adipose tissue of rats than

provision of unsaturated fatty acids

70

, resulting in catabolism and ultimately in apoptosis

71

.

Intravenous lipid emulsions provided in critically ill children are traditionally rich in n-6 fatty

acids impacting neural development, growth, immune function and outcome after surgery

72

.

The alternative lipid emulsions, enriched with n-3 fatty acids, are safe and effective in reducing

the infection rate and length of stay of adult ICU patients

73

and might promote the resolution

of the inflammatory process in children post-surgically

74

. However, evidence for the use of

these emulsions in critically ill children is solely based on surrogate endpoints (Chapter 5) and

therefore differs between PICUs (Chapter 2).

Also in the PEPaNIC study, different types of lipid emulsions were used (predominantly

SMOFlipid® in Leuven and Intralipid® in Rotterdam). A more detailed analysis is needed to

investigate the relation between type of lipid emulsion and clinical outcomes, such as PICU

dependency and incidence of new infections.

With the current lacking and conflicting evidence, the macronutrient dose dependency

analysis of PEPaNIC is eagerly awaited. The optimal timing for the initiation of PN should be

marked by the moment in which its benefits on clinical outcomes by providing essential