2
2
One’s approach towards the environment is informed by one’s conceptions of nature, culture,
self, body, others, and the sacred. In other words, the complex of beliefs and attitudes concerning
the relation of God to nature, the relation of human beings with each other, the relation of soul
and body, and the relation of culture to nature determines the normative premises of one’s
approach towards the environment. With the rise of the modern, industrial, capitalist, nationalist,
and technological social order, a materialistic and mechanistic worldview began to develop and
dominate Western consciousness. The outcome of this approach to life has been an obsessive
emphasis on material values and selfish desires which has defined the meaning and purpose of
life in terms of the maximization of consumption and material gratification in the context of a
competitive, aggressive, and unequal world economy. The result has been mass poverty on the
one hand, and an increasing disparity between the masses of the desperately poor and
comfortably rich on the other, as well as the increasing degradation and destruction of the
environment.
Because of the significance of this foundational (and mostly unconscious) determination
of behavior we need to examine the phenomenology of this materialistic consciousness and the
history of its emergence, lest we fall into the mistake of considering the current dominant
worldview as natural and normal or an eternal curse of humanity. In fact, the materialistic and
mechanistic worldview is only a recent and historically specific phenomenon which is linked to a
particular type of organization of life and society, and one which can and must be transcended if
humanity’s will to life is to be realized. In the next section we will briefly review the premodern
conception of nature and culture and the two stages of the development of the modern
mechanistic worldview.
A. The Premodern conception of nature and culture
Although there have been various interpretations of nature and culture in nonindustrialized and
premodern societies, all those interpretations and worldviews shared a fundamental principle in
their understanding of nature and society. This fundamental principle was the
organic
conception
of both nature and culture. This organic conception of nature and culture was rooted in an
organic definition of reality. Consequently, the premodern worldview not only maintained the
organic character of both nature and culture but also emphasized the existence of an organic
interrelation, exchange, harmony, and unity between the two realms. In that traditional