Previous Page  212 / 262 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 212 / 262 Next Page
Page Background

scribed as his wife. She crashed the car and the repair

bill came to £400. The British client was injured and

he instructed members to pay the £400 at £10 per week

out of damages which he would recover on a personal

injury claim. As a result members gave an undertaking

to the garage to pay the repair bill out of the damages.

Later the British client wrote to members saying that

the lady was not his wife and consequently he did not

regard himself liable to her debt and he requested the

solicitor to cancel the undertaking to the garage. The

Council felt that the solicitor was bound by his under-

taking. They felt that the question of whether the

revocation of authority was binding is a question of

law. They referred members to the previous statement

of the Council in the

Gazette,

September/October 1972,

page 233, which suggests that solicitors for their own

safety should have their clients sign a form of irre-

vocable retainer attached to the undertaking itself.

Vendor to bear expense of Land Registry map

Members wrote requesting further information on the

Council's recommendation in Vol. 64 of the

Gazette,

September/October 1970, page 92, that a vendor should

furnish an official Land Registry map as part of the

title in Land Registry transfers. Members asked who

should bear the expense of procuring the Land Registry

map. The Council on a report from a committee recom-

mended that the vendor should bear this expense.

Retirement of Secretary

The President stated that this would be the last

meeting to be attended by Mr. Plunkett in his capacity

as Secretary of the Society, an office which he had held

since 1942. He paid tribute to Mr. Plunkett for his

service to the Society in which various members of the

Council joined.

The Secretary replying thanked the Council and

wished every success to his successor Mr. James J. Ivers,

Director General, who was present.

Reform of Legal Education

The President reported on behalf of the deputation

which was received by the Minister for Justice on 27

July 1973 (L/53/2). The Minister had approved in

broad principle of the Society's proposals for the reform

of legal education but had indicated that he was not

disposed to recommend legislation abolishing the Irish

examination.

Circuit Court Rules Committee

It was unanimously resolved to appoint Mr. Thomas

Gannon, solicitor, Mohill, in place of the late Mr.

Francis J. Gannon.

District Court Rules Committee

It was unanimously resolved to reappoint Mr. William

A. Osborne as one of the Society's representatives on

the Committee with effect from 4 December 1973.

Court Dispute:

Minister's Advice to Justices

Every District Justice had discretion to extend or reduce

the time appointed for lodging documents, the Minister

for Justice said yesterday. Mr. Gooney was referring to

statements by some District Justices regarding the "so-

called work-to-rule" by provincial court clerks.

These Justices, the Minister announced, were re-

ported as saying that, because of the "work-to-rule"

they could not deal with documents which had not

been lodged in the court office within the prescribed

time.

"Without in any way wishing to interfere with the

discharge of their judicial functions by these Justices,

the Minister considers it his duty to point out that every

District Justice has discretion to enlarge or abridge the

time appointed for lodging documents" a Government

Information Bureau statement announced.

"It follows that members of the public with business

in the court have the right to demand that documents

be accepted in the court office and that they be placed

before the Justice so that he may be enabled to exercise

the discretion vested in him. That discretion has tradi-

tionally been exercised in favour of the applicant where

this does not adversely affect any other party interested

in the proceedings."

Mediation Offer

The statement added that the Minister had informed

the Council of the Dublin Solicitors' Bar Association,

which had approached him with an offer to mediate in

the dispute, that if there was any way in which their

intervention could bring about a resumption of discus-

sions with the clerks he would welcome it.

The Minister accused the clerks of choosing to resume

their "so-called" work-to-rule to coincide with the

annual licensing session of the court—an action calcu-

lated to inflict the greatest possible inconvenience on

the legal profession and on the public. The Minister's

response to the Bar Association offer was welcomed last

night by the 104-strong Clerks' Association.

But referring to the Minister's accusation that they

had resumed their work-to-rule in September so as to

disrupt the annual licensing session a spokesman de-

clared : "We must again contradict this suggestion.

The District Courts take summer vacation from August

1 and resume on September 1. Obviously if we resumed

our work-to-rule in August the preparatory work for

the session would have been hit."

A strong protest was made at Nenagh Court yesterday

by Mr. Michael O'Mara, a senior member of the Bar

Association, for Tipperary, Laois and Offaly, over the

delay in the efforts to settle the dispute. Mr. O'Mara

said the Minister was himself a solicitor of more than

twenty years standing and had a good knowledge of the

difficulties they were all experiencing. They had a big

list there that day and the cases of people attending

court might not be reached. There had been untold

delays and frustration because of this dispute.

Irish Independent

(5 October 1973)

209