of avoués or others. In fact, having been consulted in
a litigious matter the avocat in Paris or larger cities,
chose or recommended an avoué (in smaller provincial
towns this was less the case). The direct connection of
the avocat with the lay client became an even greater
potential advantage with the advent of industrialisation
and a great upsurge in the country's economic life to-
wards the end of the 19th century, since non-conten-
tious business increased, the avoués became reduced to
the role of mere proceduralists. Eventually, there opened
therefore a wide field of remunerative activity for the
avocat. But he trea
c
ured his independence from the
client and wished to remain the pure legal adviser, the
orator, secluded in his chambers and not wishing to
§toop into the humdrum legal problems of industry,
trade and finance, or family matters. The Bar main-
tained a strict code of professional conduct, based on
this restricted concept of the lawyer's role and it was
not permitted for an avocat to attend outside chambers,
to accept directorships or salaried posts in company
legal departments. Avocats' chambers in most cases
were run with a minimum of clerical staff and facilities,
more or less like those of English barristers. All these
factors led to an absence of close contacts and relation-
ship with day-to-day problems of the clientele and
with the economic world, for which the young avocat
was, anyway, not trained. A university degree in law
followed by short practice in chambers, qualified for
call to the Bar; it was not until the 1940s—under the
Vichy rule—that a higher diploma was introduced, a
certificate of "profe
r
sional capacity", to be obtained
before call. At the same time, courses enabling students
to understand some practical aspects of their future
activities, in addition to their academic and pro-
fessional training, were introduced.
The conseil juridique
The complex needs of modern life and business
demanded training and a practical education, adapted
to these, to the needs of the whole fabric of a modern
country. Had the avocat satisfied these needs he could
have become the lawyer, with a general and lucrative
practice. But his lack of contact with life and business
left a gap which was filled by all sorts of willing candi-
dates, opportunists, men of business experience, retired
civil servants, even gendarmes, agents or, lately, men
with an academic degree in law but no other legal
training, who came to be called
conseil juridique
or,
colloquially,
hommes d'affaires.
Anyone, without any
knowledge of or training in law whatsoever, could so
practise and many self-appointed advisers with the most
varied backgrounds came through this wide-open door,
to dispense "legal" advice and perform services some-
times with common sense but often without competence.
No professional regulations nor association policed the
activities of these conseils juridiques; they could canvass
and advertise for clients and serve them according to
their own self-set standards and rates. Visitors to French
cities will recall having seen large name plates or signs
at door entrances or affixed to buildings in prominent
positions advertising the con
c
eil juridique operating on
the premises and often his special aptitudes. Readers
may have observed their advertisements in the French
press. Large such offices, often incorporated with limited
liability mushroomed and appropriated highly profit-
able legal work either from the qualified lawyers or
self-generated in the absence of qualified practioners.
They were consulted even on complex legal and tax
matters by people who either could not go to an
avocat, or did not know that this was the right thing
to do, since the conseils juridiques became ingrained in
the community's life.
Companies, in the absence of a qualified, practical
legal profession with appropriate standards, were com-
pelled to set up their own legal departments, manned
by salaried university trained staff—not by avocats. The
French Bar, promoted this tendency by forbidding the
acceptance of any salaried legal appointment by avocats
and disbarred offenders.
The pre sure for reform
Thus, by default, . much lucrative non-contentious
work went to notaries and much of it came to rest,
for the same reason, with the conseils juridiques. In
the end, public and professional opinion began to press
for reform of an archaic profession. For reasons beyond
the scope of this article, notaries were not to be in-
cluded in the reform, nor were the avocats to the
"Conseil d'Etat" (the supreme administrative court,
having jurisdiction in public, administrative and fiscal
law), and before the "Cour de Cassation", the highest
court of appeal—a class by themselves, small in num-
bers.
The reform
During the debate of the reform, it was intended to
bring the
conseils juridiques
also i nto the new re-
formed, fused legal profession, but the difficulties
appeared to be insuperable. To appreciate these, it is
sufficient to realise the great number of conseils juridi-
ques practising (estimates only are available; they range
from 5,000 to 15,000), the great diversity of their train-
ing and education—if any—the extremes in their stand-
ing and the necessity to respect acquired rights. The
avoués,
on the other hand, could be more easily assimil-
ated to the Bar and also more easily compensated in
respect of their acquired rights. No "major" reform was
therefore attempted and the small reform, introduced
by the law of 31 December 1971, created with effect
from 16 September 1972 a new profession, conferring
the title
avocat
on
all who practised the new, fused
profession.
Included in it, within the existing Bar
associations and with the right to practise the
whole
litigious and non-litigious professional activities (except
those reserved for notaries and the higher ranking
barristers) mentioned, were
avocats. avoués
and
agrees,
who, as will be recalled, practised before the special
commercial courts. Avoues attached to
appeal courts
are, for the time being, to continue without being
fused. The avoués, brought into the new profession
and who, by their inclusion, have lost valuable property
rights, their monopoly "charge", are being indemnified
from a levy, collected from litigants. Compensation is
distributed through a fund specially set-up.
Conseils juridiques now restricted
But what happens to the
conseil juridique
in the
reform? Henceforth, they must be registered on a Roll
kept by the Procureur de la Republique, who is to
exercise some disciplinary powers over them.
Conseils
juridiques
having practised for at least 5 years are
admitted to the Roll without legal training or educa-
tion, merely on account of having so practised. Those
with only 3 years practice qualify for admission if they
have a prescribed, minimal legal degree. Conseils
juridiques having less than 3 years practice require a
degree of law (bachelor's or doctorate), or an equiva-
lent foreign diploma as a condition to be allowed to
practise.
218




