Previous Page  9 / 262 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 262 Next Page
Page Background

vaious offences, and it is estimated that another 2,500

are under supervision at home for delinquency. The

numbers of State departments and other Bodies dealing

with these children, all of whom can safely be classified

as "deprived", is far too many. The Department of

Health, the Department of Education and the Depart-

ment of Justice, between them take responsibility for

reformatories, industrial schools, children's homes, the

probation service, the special prison for juveniles and

the Juvenile liason scheme of the Gardai, while volun-

tary Bodies like the Adoption Societies and the Society

for Prevention of Cruelty to Children do their share in

the provision of adoptive parents and in trying to keep

a broken home together. Could anybody but a lunatic

suggest that in this tortuous way we are realistic in

coping with this problem of our deprived children;

could anybody but a fool suggest that with all these

Services so inextricably interrelated, immediate action

is not needed in the joint spheres of overall planning

and legal reform under the aegis of one responsible

Minister and department.

Planning and Development Legislation

Another important subject requiring legal reform

without delay is our planning and development legisla-

tion. Proposed amendments have been submitted by

An Taisce, the Dublin Civic Group and other Bdoes

and they have recently paid our Society the compliment

of asking us to consider them. Too many gaps exist in

our existing legislation through which those with little

or no regard for the beauty of our countryside or the

dignity of our cities can all too easily wriggle, and the

manner in which these gaps can be plugged is surely

a job that should be happily undertaken by our Society,

and I have no hesitation in recommending to your

newly elected Council that this is a matter that should

be placed high on its list of priorities.

The Provincial Solicitors' Association has recently

drawn my attention to another matter which, though of

relatively small importance, does need to be changed.

I refer to the provision in the Superior Courts Rules

which makes it incumbent on any Solicitor who seeks

to have a High Court Action remitted for hearing to

the High Court on Circuit in a particular area to bring

a Motion to remit therefor. Surely it should be suffi-

cient for the purpose to lodge a simple form of Consent,

signed by both the Plaintiff's and Defendant's Solicitors,

in the Central Office of the High Court and have the

case remitted without incurring the unnecessary expense

that the present system entails.

Kings Hospital

Members are constantly enquiring as to what is

happening about Kings Hospital, and all I can do at

the moment is to resort to the use of one of our well-

known modern cliches, and say: "Negotiations at the

moment are at a delicate stage". Members may how-

ever be assured that if the Society decides to dispose of

the property, any liability incurred to date is likely to

be amply covered. If, on the other hand, the Society

should decide to move into Kings Hospital, they will

ensure, before doing so, that the new building will be

fully adapted to the Society's needs, and that the cost

of such adaptation and of the future running costs of

Kings Hospital will be within the Society's resources

and will not entail the imposition of any levy on our

members.

I would like to conclude with an expression of my

sincere appreciation of the services given by my two

vice-presidents and members of the Council during the

year and also the secretariat and staff of the Society.

Without this support I could not have discharged the

duties of my office and I would like to take this oppor-

tunity of placing on record my sincere appreciation of

everyone who has helped me in carrying out what has

proved to be an onerous task. We are very sorry to lose

the services of Mr. Finnegan who has notified us he is

leaving at the end of the year, and we wish him every

success in the future.

The motion was seconded by Mr. T. V. O'Connoi.

Discussion

A discussion followed in which Messrs Crivon,

Buckley, McCarron, O'Beirn, T. C. G. O'Mahony and

Carroll Moran participated.

Amongst the points raised were :

Mr. Crivon deprecated any easing of restrictions in

regard to apprentices on the ground that they had no

practical experience when they qualified, and he was

against admitting those who were not fully trained.

The Society should press for more urgent law reform,

and it was essential that the costs of litigation should

be kept up with the cost of living.

The President, in reply, stated he was opposed to a

closed shop for apprentices, and that there was undue

delay on the part of statutory bodies in recommending

increases in costs.

Mr. John Buckley was pleased to note that it was

not proposed to continue to lecture to apprentices in

this hall, where the acoustics were unsatisfactory. He

asked whether it would be possible to separate the

registration functions of the Society from its other

functions.

Mr. T. C. Gerard O'Mahony mentioned Auditor's

Certificates and EEC Regulations; the President

pointed out that these regulations would shortly be

available in the Library.

Mr. Carroll Moran suggested that Latin could hence-

forth be dispensed with as a subject in the Preliminary

Examination.

The President replied to the various points raised.

The motion for the adoption of the report was put to

the meeting and carried unanimously.

Thursday 29th November 1973 was appointed as the

date of the next Annual General Meeting.

Mr. Buckley then moved that the senior vice-

President take the chair. Mr. T. V. O'Connor took the

chair and Mr. Buckley proposed a vote of thanks to

the President for his distinguished services to the

Society during his year of office. Mr. O'Connor, vice-

Preident, associated himself with the motion which

was then put to the meeting and carried with

acclamation.

» /