Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

and recall facts. CCSD59 is attempting to develop an

assessment solution that will include state and local

measures, SEL indicators, 21st century learning skills, and

foundational academic skills in math and literacy.

Assessing theWholeChild

CCSD59 is committed to assessing the growth of the whole

child and developing an assessment solution that utilizes

a combination of academic and social-emotional growth

measure and PARCC individ-

ual scores. The balance of

utilizing growth data, attainment

data, and social-emotional

learning data allows CCSD59

to reinforce the importance

of measuring student growth

and achievement over time,

pushing our focus further away

from one-time, high stakes

assessment. The assessment

solution also aligns with the assessment recommendation

included in the Illinois Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

plan that was recently approved by the United States

Department of Education (USDE).

Student Growth

Foundationally, our system of assessment is built on the

premise that every student is to achieve a minimum of one

year’s growth over the course of a school year. Although a

seemingly reasonable outcome, the goal remains a challenge

in CCSD59 as nearly 60% of our families meet the criteria

for poverty and 58% qualify for free and reduced lunch, both

significant challenge indicators when considering student

attainment. In order to more effectively meet this goal, we

determined to transition from a reactive RtI model to a

proactive MTSS model that will focus intervention design

on strengths and interests versus a deficit view. This shift

challenges us to focus on what students can do rather than

looking solely at skill deficits (can’t do). More specifically, we

endeavor to provide students with effective learner strategies

that can be matched to student strengths and learning

preferences.

A final shift in our MTSS transition was to revisit our approach

for designing and providing Tier 2 interventions. In an attempt

to maintain every student in a

regular classroom setting, we

moved away from a traditional

pull-out intervention model for

math and literacy and moved to

a push-in delivery model (Tier 2

only). We have also developed

a support team of experts—

literacy interventionists and

instructional coaches that we

termed our “synergy team” to

participate in MTSS planning and push into the classroom to

support, guide, and monitor intervention plans. The synergy

team provides small group instruction (Tier 2 intervention)

and student support while also modeling intervention

strategies for the classroom teacher. Our coaches also

develop coaching cycles with staff to delve deeper into the

instructional practice taking place in the classroom. In short,

it is our goal that every classroom teacher becomes an

expert in intervention and core instructional practice. The

synergy team is a critical support group in supporting staff so

they can achieve this goal.

In both the current and subsequent school years, we have

made a significant commitment to leadership and staff

training in the area of our MTSS process and strength-

31

Developing a

comprehensive assessment

solution that measures soft skills

in meaningful ways presents a

formidable challenge.

21st century learning

critical

thinking

COMPETE GLOBALLY

G R O W T H O F T H E W H O L E C H I L D

technology-infused

modern skill set

...

...