Previous Page  19 / 162 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 162 Next Page
Page Background

17

1

Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM: Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.

Hear Res 1993;

66:108-120.

Smoorenburg GF: Cochlear Implant Ear Marks; Cochlear Implant Ear Marks.

University Medical Center Utrecht, 2007 pp 15-34.

Spahr AJ, Dorman MF: Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding.

Ear

Hear 2005;

26:2S-6S.

Tavora-Vieira D, Rodrigues S: The use of Nucleus CI422 in a ski-slope high-frequency hearing loss and chronic external ear pathology: a

case study.

Cochlear Implants Int 2013;

14:291-294.

van der Beek FB, Boermans PP, Verbist BM, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH: Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without

positioner.

Ear Hear 2005;

26:577-592.

van der Beek FB, Soede W, Frijns JH: Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in

an artificial diffuse noise situation.

Ear Hear 2007;

28:99-110.

Volta A.: On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds.

Philos Trans 1800;

90:403-431.

Wilson B.: A Treatise om Electricity.

London, England, 1752

pp 202-208.

Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM: Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Nature 1991

;352:236-238.

Wolfe J, Parkinson A, Schafer EC, Gilden J, Rehwinkel K, Mansanares J, Coughlan E, Wright J, Torres J, Gannaway S: Benefit of a

commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.

Otol Neurotol 2012;

33:553-

560.

Zhou N, Pfingst BE: Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Ear Hear 2014;

35:30-40.