37
2
REFERENCES
Anderson, I, Weichbold, V., D’Haese, P. (2002). Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-
the-ear processor.
Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
,
81
, 229–233
Bosman, A. J., Smoorenburg, G. F. (1995). Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with
three types of hearing impairment.
Audiology
,
34
, 260–284
Cord, M. T., Surr, R. K., Walden, B. E., Dyrlund, O. (2004). Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and
everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
,
15
, 353–364
Dawson, P. W., Decker, J. A., Psarros, C. E. (2004). Optimizing dynamic range in children using the nucleus cochlear implant.
Ear and
Hearing
,
25
, 230–241
Fetterman, B. L., Domico, E. H. (2002). Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients.
Otolaryngology and Head
and Neck Surgery
,
126
, 257–263
Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., Tobey, E. A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W., Runge-Samuelson, C. L., Wackym, P. (2004)
Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
Ear and
Hearing
,
25
, 375–387
Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral
channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
110
, 1150–1163
Frijns, J. H., Briaire, J. J., de Laat, J. A., Grote, J. J. (2002). Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and
neural response imaging.
Ear and Hearing
,
23
, 184–197
Frijns, J. H., Klop, W. M., Bonnet, R. M., Briaire, J. J. (2003). Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the
clarion CII cochlear implant.
Acta Oto-laryngologica
,
123
, 138–142
Fu, Q. J., Galvin, J. J. III. (2001).Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear
implant users.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
109:1166–1172.
Fu, Q. J., Shannon, R. V., Wang, X. (1998). Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and
electric hearing.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
104
, 3586–3596
James, C. J., Blamey, P. J., Martin, L., Swanson, B, Just, Y., Macfarlane D. 2002. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear
implants: a preliminary study.
Ear and Hearing, 23
, 49S–58S.
Laszig, R., Aschendorff, A., Stecker, M., Muller-Deile, J., Maune, S., DillierN., Weber, B., Hey, M., Begall, K., Lenarz, T., Battmer, RD.,
Bohm, M., Steffens, T., Strutz, J., Linder, T., Probst, R., Allum, J., Westhofen, M., Doering, W. (2004) Benefits of Bilateral Electrical
Stimulation with the Nucleus Cochlear Implant in Adults: 6-Month Postoperative Results.
Otology and Neurotology
,
25
, 958–968
Luts, H., Maj, J. B., Soede, W., Wouters, J. (2004). Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing
AIDS.
Ear and Hearing
,
25
, 411–420
Muller, J, Schön, F., Helms, J. (2002). Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+
cochlear implant system.
Ear and Hearing
,
23
, 198– 206
Parkinson, A. J., Arcaroli, J., Staller, S. J., Arndt, P. L., Cosgriff, A., Ebinger, K. 2002. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system:
adult clinical trial results.
Ear and Hearing 23
, 41S– 48S.
Plomp, R. (1977). Acoustical aspects of cocktail parties.
Acustica
,
38
, 186–191
Ramsden, R. T. (2004). Prognosis after cochlear implantation.
British Medical Journal
,
328
, 419–420