Previous Page  241 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 241 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

THE SOCIETY

Proceedings of the Council

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL

SEPTEMBER 28th

The President in the chair, also present: Messrs W.

B. Allen, Walter Beatty, Bruce St. J. Blake, John Carri-

gan, Anthony E. Collins, Laurence Cullen, Gerard M.

Doyle, Joseph L. Dundon James R. G. Green, Gerald

Hickey, Michael P. Houlihan, Nicholas S. Hughes,

Thomas Jackson Jnr., John B. Jermyn, Francis J. Lani-

gan, Eunan McCarron, Patrick McEntee, Brendan A.

McGrath, Patrick C. Moore, George A. Nolan, Patrick

Noonan, John C. O'Carroll, Peter E. O'Connell, Thomas

V. O'Connor, Patrick F. O'Donnell, William A.

Osborne, Peter D. M. Prentice, Mrs. Moya Quinlan,

Ralph J. Walker.

The following was among the business transacted.

Lecturer and examiner in tax law

Mr. Michael O'Keeffe, B.L., was appointed in place

of Mr. Diggin owing to the unforeseen inability of the

latter to lecture on dates which would not be in conflict

with university lectures.

Circuit Court costs

It was reported that the making of new scales of

Circuit Court costs including the costs of the increased

jurisdiction have been postponed due to failure to reach

agreement on the scale of counsels' fees to be included

in the new rules. The Minister was prepared to sign the

rules already submitted giving effect to solicitors' scales

of costs but the Rules Committee were divided on this

proposal and no rules have yet been made. It was

decided that a letter should be written to the appro-

priate authorities that rules should be made dealing

with solicitors' remuneration leaving counsels' fees to be

dealt with separately.

Land Registry delays

A member wrote to the Society enclosing a list of

80 dealings lodged with the Land Registry from as far

back as March 1969 in which the title had not yet been

registered It was decided that the matter should be

taken up with the Department of Justice and with the

solicitor members in Dail Eireann.

Private Motorists Protection Insurance Co.

The P.M.P.A. offer a legal service to their members

on the same lines as the A.A. A member wrote to the

Society enclosing a letter written by the P.M.P.A. Insur-

ance Co. offering to act for the member in pursuing a

claim for damages to his car in which the P.M.P.A.

Insurance Co. had third party liability only. Corres-

pondence between the Society and the P.M.P.A. Insur-

ance Co. disclosed the information that the company

had no contractual insurance interest in the case. They

do, however, wish to operate a practice whereby a

member of the Association would be entitled to a legal

service in return for his membership subscription. It

was decided that the P.M.P.A. be informed that the

type of letter written in this case is objectionable on the

ground that there is a selection of a particular solicitor

to represent members and that if the Association wish

to provide a legal service the client should have the

right to choose his own solicitor.

Professional privilege

Members acted for an insurance company which was

defrauded by one of their employees in a substantial

sum. The employee was convicted and served a term of

imprisonment. Members were instructed to institute

proceedings against four banks for negligence. The pro-

ceedings had been settled. Neither members' clients nor

the banks wanted the publicity of Court proceedings.

Prior to the discovery of the fraud the employee had

consulted member in connection with the purchase of a

house and paid the sum of £200 towards the deposit.

Members still hold the deposit although they have been

asked by this client to return it. They know that the

money rightfully belongs to the insurance company and

the company has information as to the position and

have asked them to pay it over in part satisfaction of

the employee's liability. The Council stated that the

matter is covered by professional privilege and that no

information or payment should be given to the com-

pany without the client's consent. If the company

obtained a )garnishee order the position would be

different.

Delay in the publication of statutes

It was decided that the matter be taken up with the

solicitor representatives in the Oireachtas.

Estate duty on property sold by personal representatives

in the course of administration

The Secretary drew attention to the provisions of

Section 32 of the Finance Act, 1971, which amended

Section 8 (4) of the Finance Act, 1894. The effect of

this amendment seems to be that a purchaser from

personal representatives of leasehold property in the

course of administration may have to require a certifi-

cate of discharge from death duties. The Secretary had

been in communication with the Estate Duty Office and

while it appeared that this was not the intention of the

amendment the position seems to be doubtful. It was

decided to send a case to counsel for advice.

Blackhall Place

A request has been received from the Dublin Cor-

poration for permission to use the premises as a transit

centre in the event of an influx of refugees from

Northern Ireland in the case of an emergency. It was

decided to accede to the application subject to a com-

plete indemnity to be drafted by the Society's solicitors

against any liability for damage to persons or property.

- 2 4 5