Previous Page  251 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 251 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

basis of Irish judgments is lost. It is hoped that this

unfortunate tendency will be remedied in future. Other-

wise this volume has well maintained the high standard

of its predecessors.

British Government Today by Barry Jones; London,

Sweet and Maxwell, 1972; 8vo; pp. xv plus 236; £1.

This is one of the useful books that have appeared in

the series "Concise College Texts". The author is not

only a qualified barrister, but also headmaster of a

school in Bristol; he has a most felicitous style, and has

acquired the knack of imparting knowledge in an inter-

esting way. The usual subjects such as the Executive,

the Legislature and the Administration of Justice are

dealt with succinctly. The author is right in suggesting

that much of Criminal Law is obscure, confused and

uncertain and should be replaced by a Modern Crim-

inal Code. The author is against fusion of the legal

profession, and the main reason given is the fact that

a small Bar will develop a mutual confidence with the

Bench. The real weakness of the British Constitution is

that it is unwritten, and is consequently liable at will to

change by the Government of the day.

Gale (Charles James) The Law of Easements, fourteenth

edition by Spencer Maurice and Robert Wakefield;

London, Sweet and Maxwell; 8vo; pp. xliv plus 410; £9.

Since Gale published the first edition of his learned

work in 1839, there have been no less than ten different

editors in the different editions. In the .tenth edition

(1925), which contained 591 pages, Mr. W. J. Byrne

had not changed the alterations made by Mr. Carson in

1916. In the eleventh edition (1932), which contained

611 pages, Mr. Graham Glover had to contend with the

edition by Spencer Maurice and Robert Wakefield;

London, Sweet and Maxwell; 8vo; pp. xliv plus 410; £9.

Since Gale published the first edition of his learned

work in 1839, there have been no less than ten different

editors in the different editions. In the tenth edition

(1925), which contained 591 pages, Mr. W. J. Byrne

had not changed the alterations made by Mr. Carson in

1916. In the eleventh edition (1932), which contained

611 pages, Mr. Graham Glover had to contend with the

changes brought about by the English Property Statutes.

Mr. McMullen, in editing the twelfth edition in 1957,

which contained 589 pages, brought the case law up to

date. Mr. Bowles, in editing the thirteenth edition in

1959, which was reduced to 422 pages, wrote an inter-

esting preface, in which he listed the changes, such as

the discarding of the first chapters (170 pages), and its

replacement by new material (115 pages), the rewriting

of the chapters on Prescription and on Rights of Way,

and the omission of citations from the Civil Law. The

present editors in this edition have fortunately con-

tinued the lead given by Mr. Bowles, by omitting a

chapter on Nuisances, and the citation of lengthy judg-

ments has been pruned; furthermore they have included

a new chapter on Easements and Registered Land, and

yet succeeded in keeping the work within a reasonable

compass, which is in itself a remarkable achievement.

It is unfortunate that the editors appear to have omit-

ted vital Irish Cases, such as

Smyth v Dublin Theatre

Co.

(1936) IR 692, as to ancient lights,

McDonagh v

Mullholland

(1931) IR 110, and

Maude V Thornton

(1929) IR 454—as to ways of necessity. As these cases

are just as important as corresponding English cases, it

is surprising that they have not received the full exposi-

tion they deserve. Otherwise the standard which this

workh ad previously attained has been well maintained.

The printing and setting are as usual excellent.

Human Rights in the World by A. H. Robertson;

Manchester University Press, 1972; 8vo, pp. vii plus

280; £3.60.

Those of us who had the privilege of listening to Dr.

Robertson lecturing on human rights in our library a

few years ago will remember how, due to his erudition

and masterful exposition, he had demonstrated what a

master of his subject he was. We had already read with

interest his views about "Human Rights in Europe"

when it was first published in 1963, and now he has

extended his unrivalled knowledge to the world. Apart

from dealing with the Human Rights Universal Declar-

ation and the European Convention he has some new

material on the United Nations Covenant on Civil and

Political Rules, on the Inter-American Declaration of

Human Rights, on the permanent Arab Commission

and on the proposed African Commission on the same

subject; the full text of most of these are given. A

distinction is made between universal human rights, an

humanitarian law which relates to particular categories

like the sick, the wounded and prisoners of war. Those

who wish to specialise in this important subject, could

not do better than learn it from a master like Dr.

Robertson.

- 2 5 5