Previous Page  8 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

by Carl Schonborn, Pr Eng

Shale Gas

Field

Volume of

Drilling Water

per well (l)

Volume of Fractur-

ing Water per

well (l)

Total Volumes

of Water per

well (l)

Approximate Number of

40 000 (l) road tankers

Barnett Shale

1 500 000

8 700 000

10 200 000

250

Fayetteville Shale 230 000*

11 000 000

11 230 000

280

Haynesville Shale 3 800 000

10 000 000

13 800 000

350

Marcellus Shale 300 000*

14 400 000

14 700 000

370

Table 1 presents estimated per well water needs for four

shale gas fields in the United States of America.

Froma paper, ‘Modern Shale Gas Development in the United

States for the US Department of Energy by GWPC and ALL

Consulting – Tulsa Oklahoma’ [1], there is discussion about

the ultimate location of fracturing fluids after drilling and

fracturing of a shale bed. Unrecovered fluids, if any, will be

located in the natural shale bed pores and some will occupy

the micro-pore space vacated by the gas that is produced.

Also, some of the fracturing fluids remain stranded in

* Drilling carried out with ‘mists’ (less water) or oil-based

muds for deep horizontal well completions.

6

Chemical Technology • May 2016

New water treatment technologies and new

applications of existing technologies are

being developed and used to treat shale

gas produced water. The treated water can

be reused as fracturing make-up water,

irrigation water, and in some cases even

drinking water. New approaches and more

efficient technologies are needed to make

treatment and re-use a widespread reality.

The potential of water re-use

in shale gas bed

fracturing in

South Africa

T

he drilling and hydraulic fracturing of a horizontal

shale gas well may typically require 7,5 – 15 mil-

lion litres of water [5], with about 12 million litres

being most common. The volume of water needed may

vary substantially between wells and the volume of

water needed per metre of well appears to be decreas-

ing as technologies and methods improve over time.

fractures within the reservoir rock and heal after

fracturing,

thus preventing the fluids from flowing back to the well.

There are two sources of water that emanate from the

hydraulic fracturing of shale beds. Flowback water and

Produced water.

Flowback water

is a water-based solution that flows back

to the surface during and after the completion of fracturing.

It consists of the fluid used to fracture the shale. The fluid

contains clays, chemical additives, dissolved metal ions and

total dissolved solids (TDS). Most of the flowback occurs

in the first seven to ten days while the rest can occur over

a three to four week time period. The volume of recovery

is anywhere between 20 % and 40 % of the volume that

was initially injected into the well, ie, 2,5 - 5 million litres of

water. The rest of the fluid remains absorbed in the shale

formation.

Produced water

, in contrast, is naturally occurring wa-

ter found in shale formations that flows to the surface

throughout the entire lifespan of the gas well. This water

has high levels of TDS and leaches out minerals from the

shale including barium, calcium, iron and magnesium. It

also contains dissolved hydrocarbons such as methane,

ethane and propane.

Some of these stranded fluids may flow back to the well in

very small volumes over an extended time span. By pursuing

the pollution prevention hierarchy of ‘Reduce, Re-use, and

Recycle’, statutory bodies are examining both traditional

and innovative approaches tomanaging shale gas produced

water. This water is currently managed through a variety of

mechanisms, including underground injection, treatment

and discharge, and recycling.

Table 1: Estimated water needs for drilling and fracturing wells in some USA

shale gas fields