Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  94-95 / 2437 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 94-95 / 2437 Next Page
Page Background

PSEUDO-RESPONSE:

Angiogenetic inhibitors can cause a decrease in contrast

enhancement due to reduction in blood-brain barrier permeability rather then true

reduction in volume

(

Clarke JL et al. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2009).

Pseudo-response might be an indicator of subsequent favourable response

A 47-year-old man with GBM. A reduction of the enhancing portion of the lesion is observed 1 day after initiation of cediranib

treatment. Four weeks later, besides a continuing reduction in the enhancing portion, an expansion is observed in the FLAIR

images. Expansions in both the enhancing area and abnormal hyperintense areas consistent with tumor progression were

observed subsequently (L.C. Hygino da Cruz Jr et al. AJNR 2011)

IMAGING of TREATMENT RESPONSE

PSEUDO-RESPONSE

RANO Criteria for pseudoresponse: greater than 50%

reduction in contrast enhancement without a significant

decrease in nonenhancing tumour.

Decreased enhancement should persist more than 4

weeks to be considered true response.