262 / 268
260
SIVAKUMARAN, Sandesh. Binding Armed Oposition Groups.
International and
Comparative Law Quarterly
, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2006, s. 369-394.
SOLIS, Gary D. Obedience of Orders and the Law of War: Judicial Aplication in
American Forums.
American University International Law Review
, Vol 15, No. 2,
2000, s. 481-526.
STERIO, Melina. The United States´s Use of Drones in the War on Terror: The (Il)
legality of Targeted Killings Under International Law.
Case Western Reserve Journal of
International Law
, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2012, s. 197-214.
STEWARD, James G. Towards a single definition of armed conflict in international
humanitarian law: A critique of internationalized armed conflict.
International Re-
view of the Red Cross
, Vol. 85, No. 850, 2003, s. 313-350.
ŠTURMA, Pavel. Definice zločinů a další hmotněprávní aspekty v Římském statutu
Mezinárodního trestního soudu.
Trestněprávní revue
, No. 2, 2002, s. 43-50.
ŠTURMA, Pavel. Drawing a line between the responsibility of an international or-
ganization and its member states under international law. Česká ročenka mezinárod-
ního práva veřejného a soukromého, Vol. 2, 2011, s. 3-19.
ŠTURMA, Pavel. Význam přijetí Statutu Mezinárodního trestního soudu.
Právní
rozhledy
, No. 1, 1999, s. 8-14.
TITTEMORE, Brian D. Belligerents in blue helmets: Applying international hu-
manitarian law to United Nations peace operations.
Stanford Journal of International
Law
. Vol. 33, 1997, s. 61-118.
VITÉ, Sylvain. Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal
concepts and actual situations.
International Review of the Red Cross
, Vol. 91, No. 873,
2009, s. 69-94.
VOGEL, Ryan J. Drone Warfare and the Law of Armed Conflict.
Denver Journal of
International Law and Policy
, Vol. 39, No.1, 2011, s. 101-138.
VRANES, Erich. The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal
Theory.
European Journal of International Law
, Vol. 17, 2006, s. 401-07.
VYSOCKÝ, Marcel: Článok 8, odst. 2, písm. f) Štatútu Medzinárodného trestné-
ho súdu: Nová kategória ozbrojeného konfliktu nejúceho medzinárodný charakter?
Právník
, Vol. 151, No. 9, 2012, s. 1002-1028.
YANG, Lijun. On the Principle of Complementarity in the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court.
Chinese Journal of International Law
, Vol. 4, No. 1,
2005, s. 123-126.
ZEGVELD, Liesbeth. Victims‘ Reparations Claims and International Criminal Courts:
Incompatible Values?
Journal of International Criminal Justice
, Vol. 8, 2010, s. 79-111.