Previous Page  50 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

Sweeping new markets for

business growth

Going abroad in the pursuit of new

markets is of interest to many Chinese

corporations, including Chinese

manufacturers, which have a number

of particular motivations. Many

manufacturing corporations in China

are seeing their sectors deregulating,

are mired by overcapacity production,

and are encountering strong pressure

on profit in their home market.

Consequently, this specific group of

Chinese corporations are unsurprisingly

seeking new markets abroad where they

can enjoy less fierce competition and

earn higher profits.

Obtaining the latest

technologies and advanced

management skills

Innovation as a means to stay ahead in

the business world is paramount for any

company, and Chinese corporations are

no different in realising the importance

of this concept. For some time,

Chinese corporations (manufacturers

in particular) have competed with

other corporations on the global

stage on low labour costs and forceful

pricing, instead of on inventive,

branded products with profit margins

that are higher. A growing number of

Chinese corporations are now certainly

developing their own technologies and

management know how to enhance

their global competitiveness. Other

Chinese corporations, however, have

gone abroad and have sought global

partnerships and/or foreign acquisitions

to fill any existing technological and/

or management skills gap that they

perceive exists between them and other

global corporations operating in the

same business environment.

M&A activity – A means to an

end

The number of mergers and

acquisitions (M&A) of overseas

business entities by Chinese corporates

has not seen any let up of late. Buoyed

by the B&R initiative, 2016 saw a rapid

increase in the number of overseas

M&A deals executed by corporations

from China. The report found that

China’s top location of interest was the

U.S., with 84 transactions completed

modern enterprise system.” In essence,

what this entails, is that China’s SOEs,

particularly the big SOEs should:

>

>

Participate and contest in global

markets.

>

>

Assign resources around the world.

>

>

Improve operational efficiency.

The B&R initiative plays a big part in

this overall scheme and will serve as a

major stepping stone as China-based

SOEs ‘feel the stones as they cross the

global economic river.’

The B&R initiative will undoubtedly

create more promising external

circumstances for China’s SOEs to

invest abroad and therefore herald

a new age of China’s SOE sector

internationalisation. By taking

advantage of the B&R initiative, it is

expected that the internationalisation

of China’s SOEs will alter emphasis

from simply expansion to enhancing

operations management and improving

global competitiveness.

POEs in particular

With the rising economic might of

Chinese POEs and the government’s

encouragement for “going out,” a

diminishing share of China’s cumulative

outward foreign direct investment

(FDI) is stemming from China’s SOEs.

To illustrate this, by the end of 2015,

China’s outward investment flow

from its SOEs stood at a 34.7% share

of total outflow However, outward

investment flow from the country’s

non-SOEs (essentially POEs) accounted

for a massive 65.3% of China’s total

accumulated outflow.

With their business flexibility, fast-paced

growth, investment diversification,

and being somewhat less affected

by clampdowns on investment in the

host countries, China’s POEs have the

potential to ride the B&R initiative and

gain even better investment results

and benefits. Having said this, however,

China’s POEs do and will continue to

face obstacles in being able to “go out.”

One of these is financing as POEs often

have to work that much harder to gain

the financial backing for their overseas

ventures from banks.

in 2016. What’s more, the amount of

actual investment involved during the

same time period, jumped by a larger

148% to U.S. $215.8 billion. According

to the same report, these deals were

concentrated in a number of specific

sectors, including, manufacturing,

financial services, and health. Highlight

deals included:

>

>

China National Chemical

Corporation’s (ChemChina) U.S. $43

billion acquisition of Switzerland’s

Syngenta AG.

>

>

State Grid Corporation of China’s

U.S. $12.4 billion acquisition of

Brazil’s CPFL Energia SA.

>

>

Bohai Financial Investment Holding’s

U.S. $10 billion acquisition of CIT

Group’s aircraft leasing assets.

Additionally, Chinese private-owned

companies (POEs), as well as private

equity and asset management firms,

have been participating much more

in overseas M&A deals. For instance,

POEs and asset management firms

from China denoted 66% and 21%,

respectively, of the total investors who

invested into overseas markets in 2016.

By contrast, the total number of M&A

deals made by China’s state-owned

enterprises (SOEs) in 2016 stood at

13%.

SOEs in particular

China’s SOEs commenced their

internationalisation strategies decades

ago and much has been achieved in

the years since. In September 2015,

the Central Committee of the CPC

and State Council issued a de-facto

plan for SOEs to further reform (titled

“Guidelines to Deepen Reforms of

SOEs”). The blueprint stated that,

“SOE reforms aim to achieve a socialist

market economy and improve the

WHAT OCCUPIERS WANT

According to the Hurun

and DealGlobe report,

the number of these deals

in 2016 increased 21%

from the previous year to

reach 438 deals.

50The Occupier Edge