Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 29 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 29 Next Page
Page Background

17

IllinoisCSI: Lessons in leadership

It is so exciting to see your

team win! When you know their

story—the hard work of team-

building, the hours of practice to

perfect their craft, and

overcoming failure and defeat

along the way—seeing them win

is even more gratifying.

The Illinois Center for School

Improvement (Illinois CSI) was

created by the Illinois State

Board of Education and

American Institutes for

Research to provide intensive

support to districts with

underperforming schools. In the past 4 years, our

“team” of Illinois CSI staff members has been happy

to share the winning strategies we have learned in

our work with school

districts in efforts to

transform systems to

deliver a better

education for

students.

The heart of what

we do is support an

Intentional System

of Continuous

Improvement—

we assist districts as

they engage in a long

-term process of

improving teaching

and increasing

student achievement.

The continuous

improvement

planning cycle

includes prioritizing

needs, planning for directed improvement,

implementing a focused plan, monitoring the progress

of adult practices and student performance, and

evaluating the results. Paramount to our work in

transforming education systems are the collaborative

leadership structures that infuse rich data and include

feedback loops at every level to monitor effectiveness

of district and school improvement plans.

We have learned valuable lessons along the way.

For instance, we have seen that a superintendent’s

vision comes to life through a focused plan, such as a

strategic plan or district continuous improvement

plan. This focused plan must be informed by

examining data from a needs assessment to prioritize

the areas needing the greatest improvement. Only

through this data-informed examination can districts

determine school improvement goals and create

objectives to achieve these goals.

Districts must then strategically monitor the

implementation of their plan by identifying the specific

data on student performance and teaching practice

they want to collect, as well as the tools to collect and

analyze these data.

The role of the district leadership team is to deeply

implement its district or school continuous

improvement plan and ensure that horizontal and

vertical communication structures are in place to

monitor and enhance each step in the plan, shown

graphically below.

Our data show that this leadership approach is a

winning strategy for our team. Ninety-three percent of

the districts receiving our coaching supports

participate in our District Leadership Team Learning

Network, Research

Forums, and

Principals

Institutes, which

have helped them

make

enhancements to

their district

improvement plans

since the original

design of their

plans. They have

put in place

research-based

tools and

processes and

adopted a data

culture to run their

systems more

efficiently based on

data and feedback

collected in our internal evaluation. Because of the

communication, feedback, and monitoring of their

plans, our districts are now working to ensure the

alignment and strategic design of their plans. This

process exemplifies how a continuous improvement

process is not just a plan written on paper—it can

come to life as part of the culture and climate of

excellence in a district.

We look forward to continuing to “team up”

with our districts toward the goal of delivering an

education system that meets the professional needs

of educators and benefits all students to manifest

our vision of high-performing districts, high-

achieving students.

Betheny Lyke, Ed.D.

Executive Director

Center for School

Improvement