Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

MOTION to ensure that the Heavy Metals Working Group will start off with Arsenic as a

target. (Gilliland/Murphy) 19 in favor, 3 against, 0 abstain. The motion carried.

Discussion continued on the fitness for purpose statement. The fitness for purpose statement

proposed read as follows:

A method for the determination of the major chemical species present in selected food matrices of

any of the following elements: Arsenic, Mercury, Cadmium or Lead.

After further discussion this was modified to the following:

Methods for the determination of the major toxic chemical species present in selected food and

beverage matrices of any of the following elements: Arsenic, Mercury, or Chromium.

MOTION to accept the Fitness for Purpose Statement for Heavy Metals Speciation as

revised. (Smith/Briscoe) 21 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstain. The motion carried.

V.

Proposal for Working Group on Meat Species Authenticity

Konings introduced Delatour, who took the floor and gave a presentatio

n 6

on the need for a working

group on Meat Species Authenticity. Delatour reviewed the history of food fraud, the motivations

for food fraud, its prevalence, and the challenges faced in preventing it. Konings asked for a straw

poll to gauge interest in approaching this topic within SPSFAM and a significant number of attendees

signaled support for this effort. Konings advised that the final decision will rest with the SPSFAM

Advisory Panel.

VI.

Recommendation on Future Priorities

Konings led a discussion on SPSFAM priorities for recommendation to the SPSFAM Advisory Panel.

Using the concepts developed at the March 2014 SPSFAM meeting as a starting point, the panel

agreed to recommend the following topics to the Advisory Panel:

Food Fraud: Meat/Fish Species

Microbiology: Fast methods for pathogens; fast methods for quantification

General: Validation guidelines for non-targeted analysis; Guidelines for Laboratory Sample

Preparation

Schwartz, as Chair of the AOAC ISPAM/FP panel, recommended that a joint group be convened to

discuss overlap between the two stakeholder panels, in particular with regards to rapid

microbiological methods.

VII.

Adjourn

Konings announced that the next meeting of the SPSFAM will be during the week of March 16 in

Gaithersburg, Maryland and that all presentations from this session will be made available online.

The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. EDT.

6

Attachment 6 – Delatour Presentation

September 7,2014 SPSFAM Meeting

Meeting Minutes V0.2