Previous Page  135 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 135 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTL

APRIL 1992

Section 201 of the Companies Act,

1963. This chapter is helpful largely

because it highlights the difficulties

which have prevented that Section

being used with any frequency and

to this extent is a useful introduction

to the objectives of the Companies

(Amendment) Act, 1990.

The author's treatment of the

Companies (Amendment) Act, 1990

opens with an explanation of the

objectives and the principal features

of the Act and compares the scheme

of the Act with similar legislation in

the United Kingdom, the United

States and in New Zealand.

Detailed consideration is given to the

issues taken into account when the

Court is asked to confirm proposals

for a scheme of arrangement. The

decisions of the High Court in the

cases of

Goodman International

Limited

and

Re: Coombe Importers

Limited

are cited. However, the

author has not had the advantage of

the several cases which have been

decided during 1991, and in

particular those in which the

position of secured creditors has

been considered.

As the number of cases decided

under the Companies (Amendment)

Act, 1990 is obviously limited, the

book is particularly helpful in its

numerous references to decided cases

in other jurisdictions on comparable

provisions. Although case law is

developing in this jurisdiction, it will

inevitably be some time before our

jurisprudence on this Act is

comprehensive. In the meantime,

precedents from other jurisdictions

will be of persuasive value, and to

that extent this feature of the book

will be useful.

The concluding chapter describes the

law and practice relating to the

administration of non-life insurance

companies under the Insurance (No.

2) Act, 1983. This chapter contains a

helpful identification of the features

which distinguish administrators

from liquidators and examiners.

The Companies (Amendment) Act,

1990 fundamentally alters the

structures available to ailing

businesses, and this publication will

therefore be of value both to

experienced insolvency practitioners

and to those who need for the first

time to acquaint themselves with

these radical developments.

Alvin Price

The Irish Student Law Review

Edited by Oisin Quinn, [Dublin,

1992, £10.00 (£1.00 p&p)]

Thackeray described a great lawyer

as a man who had laboriously

brought down a great intellect to the

comprehension of a mean object.

Thackeray claimed that the lawyer

resolutely excluded from his mind all

higher thoughts, all better things; all

the wisdom and philosophy of

historians; all the thoughts of poets;

all wit and reflection; all art, love,

truth, so that the lawyer could

master that enormous legend of the

law. Thackeray concluded that the

lawyer could not admire a work of

genius or kindle at the sight of love.

This was, of course, a libel on a

nobel profession. Lawyers are not

confined to narrow issues. Dare we

say it? No horizon is too large for

our gaze!

The

Irish Student Law Review

is

now in its second year. It is pleasant

to record that Thackeray's

indictment of lawyers confining

themselves to mean objects does not

apply to the contents of the review.

Sora O'Doherty

writes on the

difficult case of

L

-v-

L,

(Supreme

Court unreported 5 December, 1991).

Medical negligence, in the wake of

the Dunne decision, is the focus of

Joan Donnelly's

article.

Eoin O'Dell

writes on issues relating to the case

of

Cotter and McDermott (No. 2)

and, inter alia, the principle against

unjust enrichment.

Dariona Conlon

writes on contempt of court.

Anthony Wheian,

the assistant

editor, deals with Article 29.4.3 and

the meaning of "necessity".

Historical issues are considered by

Barry Doherty

under the title of

"Dissection as Punishment". The

editor,

Oisin Quinn,

considers

whether the issue of tort as a

compensation system is ripe for

reform. Other material is also

included.

Edward Henry Warren

noted that

before he finished a law review

article, he sweated blood for a

month. [58

Harvard Law Review

1115 (1945)]. Great credit it due to

the editor, Oisin Quinn, the assistant

editor, Anthony Wheian, and

Eoin O'Dell, member of the editorial

board. Has the time arrived when

the word 'Student' should be

dropped from the title of the

review? Readers expect little from

a student review. This Review

however, is filled with keen

judgment, shrewd common sense

and great erudition.

Eamonn G Hall

Denis C. Guerin

New York Attorney at Law

Member of the Law Society, Dublin

Native Killarney, County Kerry.

Willing to act as agent or counsel

to you in the US

Legal Advice and Assistance on

Wills, Inheritances, Family

Searches, throughout the U.S.A.

Specialising in Immigration,

Personal Injury,

Property Transactions, Divorces,

Wills, etc.

25 West 39th Street

New York NY 10018

Telephone:

Days: 212-398-9238

Evenings: 212-796-0970

Fax: 212-391-6917

ill