![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0190.jpg)
GAZETTE
w
N
Prosecuting Fraud
JUNE 1992
The prosecution of serious fraud in
this country seems to pose particular
difficulties for the Garda and
prosecuting authorities. Various
reasons have been advanced for this,
including the current state of the
criminal law, which makes it difficult
in some cases to obtain the necessary
proofs to sustain prosecutions in
court especially where persons have
been in positions of trust and have
had access to and control over
funds. Questions have also been
raised about whether the Garda
authorities have available to them
the requisite skills to investigate
complicated areas of commercial
activity in the corporate sphere often
involving complex transactions the
understanding of which would test
the skills of specialists in the field.
In England, the authorities addressed
this matter by establishing a special
office to deal with serious fraud.
This was put under the direction of
a top-notch lawyer, Ms. Barbara
Mills QC, who is now the Director
of Public Prosecutions. That office
is staffed by specialists, including
lawyers and accountants, who are
experts in company law and financial
matters, including information
technology. It works under the
general aegis of the office of the
Director of Public Prosecutions. The
former Thoiseach, Mr. Charles
Haughey, TD, mooted the idea of
establishing a similar office here
some time ago. This idea did not,
apparently, find favour with some of
the Garda representative bodies and
seems not to have been pursued. The
Director of Public Prosecutions has
also expressed strong views on the
need for action in this area. He
favours changes which would include
a move away from the adversarial
system in our courts to an
inquisitorial-type approach. Recently,
the Minister for Justice announced
the establishment of a working party
to examine the issues involved and to
bring forward recommendations.
Side by side with this development,
the Law Reform Commission are
currently working on the
modernisation of the law of
dishonesty and they have published a
very detailed and comprehensive
working paper.
We would say that this is an area
that requires serious and urgent
attention and it is to be hoped that,
through a combination of reform of
the law and a new approach to the
investigation of fraud - involving
the establishment of a special unit
staffed with the requisite skills,
whether located in the Garda or
directly under the DPP - the
prosecution of fraud, and white
collar crime generally, will be
significantly improved. The Law
Society has made it clear that, in
relation to its own role of policing
the solicitors' profession, there have
been serious problems in ensuring
that solicitors who misappropriate
clients' funds are brought to book in
the criminal courts. The Society
believes that there is an urgent need
to create new criminal offences
which will allow prosecutions, in
appropriate cases, to be taken more
easily. There are difficulties in
sustaining prosecutions for larceny or
embezzlement which are the main
criminal offences applicable in this
area. New offences, which will
address the realities of the day-to-
day practice of solicitors, in
particular the handling by solicitors
of clients' funds, are needed. The
Law Society has urged the
Government to create new offences
in the Solicitors (Amendment) Bill,
and it is to be hoped that the
Government will accede to this
request and bring forward
amendments at the committee stage
to achieve this.
It is clearly right that the sanction of
the criminal law should be applied
to solicitors who betray the trust
placed in them by the community.
Criminal sanctions are entirely
appropriate because of the
seriousness of these offences and
also because of the need to provide
deterrence and to bring home to the
public at large that the profession
itself is determined to take every step
open to it to rid the profession of
miscreants of this kind. Dishonesty
in the profession in recent times has
been a matter of some concern and
although the incidence of individual
wrongdoing is small and the vast
majority of solicitors do not offend
in this regard, from recent statements
made by the President of the
Society,
(See also page 171)
it is clear
that the Society is determined to
tackle this problem in a resolute way.
The public, of course, do not suffer
when a solicitor offends in this way
because of the availability of
compensation from the fund
maintained by the Society. We
believe that reform of our laws and
procedures in relation to the
prosecution of fraud would be a step
forward in this regard.
•
ROSNEY PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
PARTNERSHIP
Commercial property management
Residential property management
Short term/self catering residential
property management
Emergency service management
Colour design,
redecoration & furnishing
No. 1 Westland Square, Dublin 2
Tel: 01-779199 Fax: 01-779355
TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS AND
THE ISLE OF MAN
Samuel McCleery
Atorney - at - Law and Solictor of PO Box 127toGrand
Twk.Turka and Cdooa Wanda, Brltoh Waal Indtoa aid at 1
Caala Staat. Cartatown, lata ol Man wtH ba plaaaad to
acoapltoatucdonaganaraly tram kMi Soddtoa Intoato-
rn ation and admlnlatratlon ol Exampt Turka and Caicoa
Ialand Companlaa and Non • Raaidanl lala ol Man
Compantoa aa wal aa Truat Admtolakakon
OT Office:-
Tot: 800 046 2818 Fa*: BOO »4« 2819
I.OMOffíce:-
W: 0624 822210 Total: 628285 Samdan Q
Fa*: 0624 823788
169