Previous Page  21 / 216 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 216 Next Page
Page Background

JULY, 1921]

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

15

(2nd sub.), Mr. John Moran, Mr. W. T.

Mackay, Anonymous, Mr. W. A. Lanphier

(2nd'Sub'.), Mr. J. F. A. Sirans, and Mr. A. T.

Ellis.

One pound

each from Mr. J. H. Dudley

and Mr. H. D. Vaughan.

A balance of fifty pounds still remains to

be collected.

Remuneration of Solicitors.—Suggested

Reform.

The Lord Chancellor of England has

appointed a Committee, consisting of Mr.

Justice Russell

(Chairman), Mr. Morton

(President, English Law Society), Sir William

Pearce,

Sir William Plender,

and Mr.

Simpkin (the Public Trustee), " to consider

" and report whether it is desirable to amend

" the law governing the method of remunera-

" tion of Solicitors by enabling Solicitors to

" charge by a gross sum, and, if so, subject to

" what provisions for the protection of the

" clients of the Solicitors."

Four Courts Offices and Staffs.

The Treasury, with the consent of the Lord

Chancellor, and the Lord Chief Justice, have

appointed a Committee, consisting of Mr.

A. P. Waterfield and Mr. J. Roe, both of the

Treasury, and Mr. Gerald Horan, K.C., Clerk

of the Crown and Hanaper, assisted by Mr.

Garratt, Solicitor, of the Chancery Registrar's

Department, Royal Courts

of

Justice,

London, to report upon the organisation and

staff requirements of the Irish Legal Depart

ments.

The Committee have visited and inquired

into the working of the various offices in the

Four Courts. As a result of representations

from the Council a deputation consisting of

the President of this Society, together with

Mr. Edwards, Vice-President, and the Secre

tary, had an interview by appointment with

the Committee on the 8th June, and various

matters in relation to the discharge of the

business transacted in the offices at the Four

Courts as

affecting

the public and

the

Solicitors' profession, were discussed, and

the deputation were

afforded an oppor

tunity of

offering opinions

on

various

suggestions put forward by the Committee

in relation to the future working of some of

the departments in the Four Courts.

Examination Results.

At the Preliminary Examination held on

12th and 13th May, the following passed the

Examination, and their names are arranged

in order of merit :—

1.

James A. Power.

2.

Samuel Anderson.

3.

John S. O'Connor.

4.

John P Dowd,

Martin Fitzgerald,

6. Alexander E. Martin.

7. Thomas G. Logue.

8.

John Pollin.

equal.

William H. M. Brownlee, Peter Hutton,

Laurence Kirwan, Stephen M. McAuliffe, and

Frederick G. Patterson passed the modified

Preliminary Examination, for which they

had liberty to present themselves.

Nineteen candidates attended ; 13 passed :

6 were postponed.

At the Final Examination held on 18th,

19th and 20th May, the following passed

the Examination and

their names

are

arranged in order of merit :—

1. Michael Tynan.

2. George McSpadden.

3. Hutchinson E. Davidson,^

,

Valentine E. Kirwan,

\

e(luai-

5. Barry M. O'Meara, B.A., N.U.I.

6. Daniel O'Leary.

7. Ronald H. Brown, B.A., N.U.I.

8. William H. Fyffe.

9.

John McGrath, B.A., N.U.I.

10. Richard J. Farrell.

11.

Francis E. Scallan.

12.

Patrick Corbett.

13. Vincent P. McMullin.

14. Michael C. Burke.

15. William J. Fitzgerald.

16.

John G. Wheeler.