Previous Page  114 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 114 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY-AUGUST 1979

Court for review of the rent every five years where the

terms of the new lease have been fixed by the Court

(Section 24).

(5) Where the Circuit Court fixes the term of a new

lease the term is to be 35 years unless the tenant opts for

a lesser period (Section 23 (2)).

(6) The definition of 'business' has been extended to

include activities of providing cultural, charitable,

educational, social or sporting services and also the public

service (Section 3 (1)).

(7) Where premises are held by one company and used

by a subsidiary company for trading the parent (or

holding) company is to be deemed to be entitled to

protection under the Bill. However, no protection is given

where the property is held by one company within a

group of companies and the trading is carried on by a

collateral company within the group. Protection

is

given

where the tenant is an individual and the premises are

occupied by a private company formed by die tenant for

the purpose of carrying on a business in the premises

(Section 5 ( 3 ) ).

(8) An 'unforeseen temporary break' in the use of the

tenement is to be disregarded where an application is

made for a new tenancy (Section 13 (2)), but there must

be doubts as to whether this can apply where there has

been a break in user, possibly on a sale of the premises

while the new purchaser gets ready to take up occupation.

(9) In order to remedy a lacuna in what was Part V of

the 1931 Act (the Part dealing with the relaxation of

covenants in leases) exposed by Mr. Justice Kenny in his

judgement in the case of Whelan and others v. Madigan

(High Court 18/7/78 - unreported), the definition of

'lease' in Part V of the Bill is extended to include tenancies

arising by operation of law or by reference on the

expiration of a lease. (Section 64).

(10) The grounds on which the Circuit Court may

extend the time for doing any act or thing provided for in

the Bill are now spelled out in some detail (Section 78).

(11) A tenant is now given the right to serve a Notice of

Intention to Claim Relief once he has qualified so to do

(Section 20 (2)) and it appears to be in the contemplation

of the draftsman that an application to the Circuit Court

might well be made and the terms of the new tenancy

determined before the expiry of the old tenancy. It is also

provided in this context that where there has been on

order for a new tenancy and the existing tenancy is

terminated for a reason arising after the grant of a new

tenancy which would have disqualified the tenant from

getting such a new tenancy then the new tenancy even

though ordered, will not come into effect (Section 26).

(12) The rights of any person claiming under the Bill

will extend or survive to their successors in title or

personal representatives (Section 72).

(13) Where premises provided by a Housing Authority

under the Housing Acts are let for die purpose of business

they are not to be excluded from the Bill (Section 6).

(14) The 1931 Act provided that a tenant would not be

entitled to a new tenancy if his tenancy was terminated by

ejectment for non-payment of rent. This has not been

extended to cover any form of ejectment based on non-

payment of rent even if framed as ejectment for

overholding or ejectment on the title (Section 17 (1)).

Correspondence

Office of the Revenue Commissioners,

Dublin Castle,

Dublin 2.

January 17, 1979

J. J. Ivers, Esq.,

Director General,

The Law Society,

Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7.

Dear Mr. Ivers,

I refer to my letter of the 13th September last in which

I expressed the hope that the arrear in cases lodged for

adjudication for the purposes of Stamp Duties would be

disposed of by the end of December. I am glad to say that

that objective was achieved. Every effort will be made to

ensure that delays will not recur and that if, owing to

unforseen circumstances, they do, the relapse will be of

minimal duration.

No doubt you will appreciate that, where cases are

referred to the Commissioner of Valuation, delay will

sometimes be unavoidable particularly where problems of

identification arise. Here again it is proposed with the co-

operation of the Commissioner, and consistent with his

statutory and other obligations, to keep the time lag at the

minimum level.

I might add that the submission of unrealistic

valuations in voluntary conveyances is often the reason

for delays in many cases.

Yours sincerely,

M. K. O'Connor (Commissioner).

Saint Luke's

Cancer Research

Fund

Gifts or legacies to assist this Fund are most

gratefully received

by the Secretary:

E S THER BYRNE,

" Oa k l a n d ",

Highfield Ro a d,

Ra t hg a r,

Dublin 6.

Telephone 9 7 6 4 9 1.

This Fund does not employ canvassers or

collectors and is not associated with any other

body in fund raising.

116