Previous Page  155 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 155 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1979

5.3

The Committee found itself in a position to assist many members who had

problems concerning obligations entered into by them in relation to undertakings or fees

chargeable by them in respect of work done. The enquiries are of a continuous nature and

deal with the various day-to-day problems that arise in the practice of a busy solicitor.

5.4

The Committee had to decline with regret expressing opinion on certain problems

presented to it which required advice on matters of law.

5.5

In conclusion, I would like to record my appreciation of the wholehearted assis-

tance and co-operation given to me by my fellow members of this Committee and by the

staff of the Society who so efficiently looked after the Committee's essential requirements.

PARLIAMENTARY

COMMITTEE

Donal G. Blnchy

Chairman

John Carrigan

Vice-Chairman

Joseph L. Dundon

Thomas J. Fltzpatrick

Robert M. Flynn

S. Carmel Killeen

Brendan A. McGrath

Raymond T. Monahan

Michael G. L. O'Connell

Frank O'Donnel!

Brian W. Russell

6.1

During the year under review the Committee studied and made submissions on

the following legislation:

(a)

Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Bill 1979:

This was the third of a series in the

landlord and tenant legislation. The two 1978 Acts dealt mainly with the abolition of

ground rents and the right to acquire the fee simple. The present is a more

comprehensive Bill; it repeals in full the Landlord & Tenant Acts 1931 and the

Landlord & Tenant (Reversionary Leases) Act 1958 and makes new and

substantially different provisions for the protection of business tenancies, residential

tenancies and reversionary leases. A detailed submission was submitted by the

Committee to the Department of Justice. Members are advised to study this Act

carefully because it affects some very important changes.

(b)

Capital Gains Tax (Amendment) Act 1978:

Submissions were made on this Bill to

the Minister for Finance particularly with reference to Section 27 and the Committee

can happily report that some of the amendments sought here were incorporated in the

Act.

(c)

Succession Act 1965:

A supplemental submission was put in on this Act in relation to

Section 90 and arising from the Supreme Court decision in the case of

Rowe v. Law

and Others

in January 1979.

(d)

Capital Acquisition Tax Act 1975:

In a submission on this Act the Committee

pressed strongly for a change in the law affecting many family settlements, especially

in the case of farmers, where an appointment by a life tenant to a child frequently

results in the position that the disponer is the grandparent of the successor or donee

and, therefore, only enjoys a threshold of £30,000.00. There are many cases in

which this could give rise to a very heavy liability for inheritance tax. The Committee

regrets to say that this submission was rejected by the Minister but it is the intention

of the Committee to press this submission strongly again when the next Finance Bill

is being introduced.

(e) The Committee is in the course of preparing a submission on the Sale of Goods and

Supply of Services Bill. This is being dealt with for the Committee by former

President, Mr. Brendan McGrath, who has put very considerable research into it.

(f) The Committee also has in hand the preparation of a submission on the Tribunal of

Enquiry and Evidence Act.

Donal G. Binchy

Chairman

6.2

During the year the 20th Interim Report of the Committee on Court Practice and

Procedure was published containing recommendations for substantial increases in juris-

diction. This report was very carefully studied by the Committee and a full submission

was made both to the Minister for Justice and the Committee on Court Practice and

Procedure supporting strongly the proposals for increased jurisdictions of the Circuit and

District Court and urging that more extensive jurisdiction be given to the District Court in

family law matters and criminal injury applications. In supporting the proposals for

increased jurisdiction the Committee warned, however, that a proper assessment would

have to be made of the increased work load that will fall on the Circuit and District

Courts; and that adequate provision will have to be made for the provision of additional

judges, justices, registrars, clerks and other officials servicing these Courts; also that there

will have to be adequate and sufficient Courtoom facilities. The Committee also consid-

ered F.L.A.C.'s report on the same subject; their report was considerably at variance with

the Committee's views but a meeting has been arranged to discuss same fully with

F.L.A.C.

6.3

Various other Bills or Acts were considered including the Redundancy

157