Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1588 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1588 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

Hospital, University of Wu¨rzburg, Wu¨rzburg, Germany.

Additional data about radiotherapy were collected and mon-

itored by the Department of Radiooncology, University of

Tu¨bingen, Tu¨bingen, Germany. The follow-up period was

defined as extending from the date of surgery to the date of

last patient contact or last event. The length of survival was

calculated from the date of surgery. Terminal events were

defined as the date of death from any cause (overall surviv-

al), the date of progression (progression-free survival), or

the date of diagnosis, progression, or death (event-free

survival). For all patients alive without events, the length of

survival for the statistical analysis was considered the last

date of the documented contact with the patient. Data for

patients who died without evidence of progression were

censored.

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival,

and the log-rank test was used for the statistical comparison

of survival estimates. We planned to perform a multivariate

analysis (Cox regression) only if more than one of the

potential prognostic factors showed a remarkable influence

in the univariate analysis (

p

,

0.1) and a minimum of 10%

of the patients had one of these risk factors. All statistical

analyses in this study were done for descriptive purposes.

Data are presented with nominal two-tailed

p

values (unad-

justed for multiple comparisons) and 95% confidence inter-

vals. All analyses were carried out with the SAS system for

Windows 6.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Patient population

Seventy-one children were treated for anaplastic

ependymoma. Pathologic findings were reviewed in 51

(71.8%) children. Sixteen children were excluded from

evaluation because the pathologic results of the review

committee revealed low-grade ependymoma (

n

5

1),

ependymoblastoma (

n

5

5), primitive neuroectodermal

tumor (

n

5

2), astrocytoma (

n

5

1), medulloblastoma

(

n

5

5), or glioblastoma (

n

5

2). Of 55 patients eligible

for the study (27 females and 28 males; age range 3.0 –

16.6 years; median, 6.2 years), pathologic review was

performed in 35 children. In 26 patients, the tumor site

was supratentorial (47.3%); in 29 children, the tumor site

was infratentorial (52.7%) (Table 1).

In 20 patients, leptomeningeal dissemination was evalu-

ated by CSF cytologic studies at presentation. Four patients

had positive CSF cytology findings; in 35 children, no CSF

findings were available, but the children underwent cranio-

spinal MRI. Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS)

were found in 2 children: 1 child had a spinal tumor in the

lumbosacral region, and the other child had cerebral dis-

semination as well as positive CSF findings. No metastases

outside the CNS were found (Table 2).

Treatment

Surgery.

All children underwent surgery. The extent of

resection was assessed by postoperative CT/MRI and was

considered macroscopically complete in 28 children and

incomplete in 27.

Chemotherapy.

Eighteen children in HIT 88/89 and 37

children in HIT 91 were treated. In the HIT 91 trial, 81% of

the patients were randomized; the parents of 7 children

refused randomization. All patients received adjuvant che-

motherapy; maintenance chemotherapy was performed in

15 children and sandwich chemotherapy in 40 children.

Radiotherapy.

Thirteen children were irradiated at the

primary tumor site only. The median total dose was 54.0 Gy

(1 patient received a dose of 55.8 Gy). The median dose per

fraction was 2.0 Gy (range, 1.8–2.0 Gy).

Forty children received craniospinal irradiation with an

additional boost to the posterior fossa. The median total

dose to the neuraxis was 35.2 Gy (range, 24.0–39.6 Gy);

15.0% of the patients received a dose of less than 30.0 Gy.

Table 1. Characteristics of 55 children with anaplastic

ependymomas treated in Germany and Austria, 1988–1997

Characteristic

No. of

patients

Percentage

Median age (range): 6.2 years (3–16)

Sex

Male

28

50.9

Female

27

49.1

Site

Infratentorial

29

52.7

Supratentorial

26

47.3

Metastases

M0

50

91.0

M1

3

5.4

M2/3

2

3.6

Surgery

Incomplete resection

27

49.1

Complete resection

28

50.9

HIT

88/89

18

32.7

91

37

67.3

Chemotherapy

Maintenance

15

27.3

Sandwich

40

72.7

Radiotherapy*

CSI

40

72.7

Local field

13

23.6

CSI

5

craniospinal irradiation.

* 2 children received no irradiation.

Table 2. Pattern of dissemination at time of diagnosis in 5

children

Age (years),

sex

Primary tumor

site

CSF

positive

Distant

metastases

M

stage

3.4, F

Infratentorial

Yes

No

M1

5.3, F

Supratentorial

Yes

No

M1

4.0, F

Infratentorial

Yes

No

M1

7.9, M Infratentorial

Yes

Cerebral

M2

8.7, M Infratentorial

Unknown Lumbosacral M3

CSF

5

cytologic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid.

289

Anaplastic ependymomas in childhood

B. T

IMMERMANN

et al.