Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1623 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1623 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

age-appropriate booklets of questionnaires to eligible participants.

The study was approved by ethics committees in all participating

countries.

Outcome measures

The 4 principal QoS outcome measures were

z

-scores on stan-

dardized age-appropriate questionnaires. These assessed executive

function in everyday life, health status, behavioral difficulties, and

HRQoL. In participants aged

<

18 years at assessment, the ques-

tionnaires were parent-report versions of the Behavior Rating

Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

(33)

; the Health Utili-

ties Index (HUI3)

(34)

; the Strengths and Difficulties Question-

naire (SDQ)

(35)

; the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory

(PedsQL)

(36)

; and, if aged 11-17 years, self-report versions of the

HUI3, SDQ, and PedsQL. Survivors aged 18 years provided

self-report versions of the BRIEF, the HUI3, and the 30 core

question version of the European Organization for Research and

Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life measure (QLQ-C30)

(37)

.

Reduction in height

z

-score compared with that at diagnosis,

known to vary with radiation treatment dose

(38)

, was the pre-

specified principal endocrine outcome. Height, weight, and

mid-parental height were expressed as

z

-scores, age- and sex-

standardized against United Kingdom British 1990 growth refer-

ence values

(39)

to allow inter- and intragroup comparisons.

Baseline demographic and secondary outcome information was

provided by clinicians using adapted versions of the Medical

Examination Form

(40)

and by adult participants and parents of

child participants using the Medical, Educational, Employment

and Social questionnaire

(40)

.

Statistical analysis

Univariate analyses of HFRT and STRT group scores were con-

ducted using Mann-Whitney

U

tests or

t

tests. Quality of survival

questionnaire scores in age-specific subgroups, governed by the

age ranges of questionnaires, were converted to a single dataset of

z

-scores in all participants where mean

Z

0, SD

Z

1 for scores of

all study participants on that measure. Proxy-report

z

-scores for

children and self-report

z

-scores for adults for BRIEF and HUI3

were thus used to create a single “executive function

z

-score”

variable and a single “health status

z

-score” variable, respectively.

Proxy-report SDQ

z

-scores, available only in participants aged

<

18 years, provided behavioral difficulties

z

-scores. Finally, child

self-report

z

-scores for PedsQL and adult self-report

z

-scores for

the QLQ-C30 were used to create a single “HRQoL

z

-score”

variable. Statistical analysis of QoS was thus simplified into 4

analyses relating to these 4 prespecified principal QoS outcomes.

Analyses of questionnaire subscales were conducted only when

total scores differed.

A regression model, including sex, younger age (3-7.9 years)

or older age (8.0-20.8 years) at diagnosis, and cerebellar mutism

(or, in an alternative model, perioperative complications including

cerebellar mutism), was used to increase the precision of the

estimate of the effect of treatment on principal QoS outcomes and

on decrement since diagnosis in height

z

-score. Sensitivity ana-

lyses were used to examine possible confounding by baseline

characteristics. Statistical significance testing (SPSS version 19.0;

SPSS, Chicago, IL) was 2-tailed with a 1% significance level to

adjust for multiple testing

(41)

.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Outcomes were ascertained in 151 of 244 eligible survivors

(61.9%) (74 of 117 [63.2%] and 77 of 127 [60.6%] that had

received HFRT and STRT, respectively) at a median interval from

diagnosis of 5.8 (range, 4.2-9.9) years. Participants and non-

participants in the QoS study receiving HFRT were similar with

respect to sex, age at diagnosis, pre- and postoperative charac-

teristics, chemotherapy received, and interval between diagnosis

and assessment of QoS to those receiving STRT; there was a small

excess of neurologic deficits of extraocular movement in those

allocated to HFRT and of premorbid developmental impairment in

those allocated to STRT

( Table 1 )

. The radiation therapy actually

delivered to PNET4 QoS study participants corresponded well to

that prescribed in both treatment arms: quality assurance included

both fields (checked in at least 68 of 151 [45%]) and dose

delivered (checked in at least 51 of 151 [34%]).

Outcomes at posttreatment evaluation

There were significant (

P

<

.01) correlations between all of the

outcome measures, including strong positive correlations (0.58-

0.80) between proxy- and self-report scores, between health status

and HRQoL scores, and between executive function and behav-

ioral difficulties scores (

Supplementary Table e1

, available on-

line). Female participants had poorer HRQoL

z

-scores than males

(group mean difference 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-

0.84,

P

Z

.008) but were similar to males with respect to executive

function, health status, and behavioral difficulties.

Effect of HFRT on executive function, behavior,

health status, and HRQoL

Scores in subgroups governed by questionnaire age ranges showed

no statistically significant differences between treatment arms

other than lower (better) adult self-report BRIEF executive func-

tion scores in those aged 18 years at assessment

( Fig. 1

). In the

merged single dataset of

z

-scores for all participants for the 4

principal outcome measures, executive function (BRIEF)

z

-scores

were significantly lower (better) after HFRT than after STRT

(group mean difference 0.48, 95% CI 0.16-0.81,

P

Z

.004)

( Table 2

), but health status, behavioral difficulties, and HRQoL of

all participants were similar in the 2 treatment arms (group mean

z

-score differences 0.26, 0.23, and 0.14, respectively, with 95%

CIs including the null point,

P

.25)

( Table 2

). The intergroup

differences in executive function (BRIEF) Global Executive

Composite

z

-scores seemed to be general effects reflected in sta-

tistically significant intergroup differences for both the Behavioral

Regulation Index, carried by inhibition, shift, and emotional

control subscales, and also for the Meta-cognitive Index, carried

by monitoring, working memory, and planning/organizing

subscores (

Supplementary Table e2

).

Effect of HFRT on growth

Compared with STRT, the mean group decrement since diagnosis

in height

z

-score after HFRT was greater by 0.43 (95% CI

Kennedy et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

294