Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  137 / 220 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 220 Next Page
Page Background

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

months. One nodal recurrence occurred after a positive SLNB,

another after a failed SLNB. The overall rate of nodal disease

was 14% (7 positive SLNB, 1 nodal recurrence). Predictors of

nodal disease were multiple high-risk factors (

P

= .008), PNI

(

P

= .05), and ALI (

P

= .05).

32

The lack of a cutaneous SCC National Tumor Registry im-

pedes large retrospective multi institutional analysis of prog-

nostic factors. Risk factors associated with a higher rate of lo-

cal recurrence andmetastases are currently defined based on

low-moderate evidence and expert consensus.

7,33,34

We evalu-

ated our data using effect size to aid in comparison of the rela-

tive size of effect of each NCCN high-risk feature with regard

to the presence of nodal disease and found that presence of

ALI, presence of PNI, and a large clinical size had a large ef-

fect on the development of nodal disease. The large width of

the CIs around the estimates of the false-negative and false-

omission rates, however, exposes the small sample size and

demonstrates the variability of these estimates. Until higher

level evidence is produced, our results, which are relatively

consistent with the literature, suggest that utilization of the

NCCN guidelines may facilitate appropriate patient selection

for future study design and current consideration for SLNB.

7

Limitations

Limitations of our study include a retrospective design asso-

ciated with missing data of some variables of interest, rela-

tively short follow up including some patients lost to follow

up after the immediate postoperative period, and overall small

numbers despite being the largest single institution report. The

purpose of our study was to review our institutional experi-

ence utilizing SLNB for cutaneous SCC on the head and neck

to provide a basis to optimize future prospective analyses over

a long period of time with long-term follow-up. We included

outcomes data, although not complete, for all patients to add

to the current body of literature on the subject, acknowledg-

ing that, owing to the limited follow up for some of our pa-

tients, the rates of recurrence and false-omission may be un-

derestimates. Despite these limitations, our study provides

unique data, particularly with regard to histologic processing

of the SLNB specimens, and additional evidence to justify fu-

ture investigation incorporating prospectively-collected, ho-

mogeneous, comprehensive data sets based on standardized

treatment algorithms.

Conclusions

Rigorous studywith optimal methodology is necessary to im-

prove surgical and histopathologic protocols for SLNB for cu-

taneous SCC and to advance our understanding of what role

SLNB may play with respect to improved staging for patients

at high risk of nodal metastasis. Further work will be neces-

sary to determine if early identification and intervention leads

to improved outcomes for these patients.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Accepted for Publication:

June 3, 2016.

Published Online:

July 20, 2016.

doi

: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1927 .

Author Contributions:

Alison B. Durham had full

access to all of the data in the study and takes

responsibility for the integrity of the data and the

accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design:

Durham, Lowe, Malloy,

Bradford, Johnson, McLean.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:

All

authors.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Durham, Lowe, Malloy,

Chubb.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important

intellectual content:

Durham, Lowe, Malloy,

McHugh, Bradford, Johnson, McLean.

Statistical analysis:

Chubb.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

Durham, McLean.

Study supervision:

Lowe, Malloy, Bradford,

Johnson, McLean.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

All authors have

completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and

none were reported.

Previous Presentation:

This study was presented

at the American Head and Neck Society Ninth

International Conference on Head and Neck

Cancer; July 20, 2016; Seattle, Washington.

REFERENCES

1

. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, Coldiron

BM. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin

cancer (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the U.S.

population, 2012

. JAMA Dermatol . 2015;151(10): 1081-1086 .

2

. Stratigos A, Garbe C, Lebbe C, et al; European

Dermatology Forum (EDF); European Association

of Dermato-Oncology (EADO); European

Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

(EORTC). Diagnosis and treatment of invasive

squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European

consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline

. Eur J Cancer . 2015;51(14):1989-2007 .

3

. Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. Cutaneous

squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of

disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease

in the United States, 2012

. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2013;68(6):957-966 .

4

. Coit DG, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines

in Oncology: Melanoma. Version I.2016.

https://www.nccn.org/.

Accessed June 1, 2016.

5

. Bichakjian CK, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice

Guidelines in Oncology: Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Version I.2016.

https://www.nccn.org/.

Accessed

June 1, 2016.

6

. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al;

MSLT Group. Final trial report of sentinel-node

biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma.

N Engl J Med . 2014;370(7):599-609 .

7

. Bichakjian CK, et al NCCN Clinical Practice

Guidelines in Oncology: Squamous Cell Skin Cancer.

Version I.2016.

https://www.nccn.org/.

Accessed

June 1, 2016.

8

. Wilson DB. Practical Meta-Analysis Effect Size

Calculator

. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org /resources/effect_size_input.php. A

ccessed June 1,

2016.

9

. Ross AS, Schmults CD. Sentinel lymph node

biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma:

a systematic review of the English literature.

Dermatol Surg . 2006;32(11):1309-1321 .

10

. Eastman AL, Erdman WA, Lindberg GM, Hunt

JL, Purdue GF, Fleming JB. Sentinel lymph node

biopsy identifies occult nodal metastases in

patients with Marjolin’s ulcer

. J Burn Care Rehabil . 2004;25(3):241-245 .

11

. Hatta N, Morita R, Yamada M, Takehara K,

Ichiyanagi K, Yokoyama K. Implications of popliteal

lymph node detected by sentinel lymph node

biopsy.

Dermatol Surg . 2005;31(3):327-330 .

12

. Stadelmann WK, Javaheri S, Cruse CW, Reintgen

DS. The use of selective lymphadenectomy in

squamous cell carcinoma of the wrist: a case report.

J Hand Surg Am . 1997;22(4):726-731 .

13

. Weisberg NK, Bertagnolli MM, Becker DS.

Combined sentinel lymphadenectomy and mohs

micrographic surgery for high-risk cutaneous

squamous cell carcinoma.

J Am Acad Dermatol . 2000;43(3):483-488 .

14

. Weber F, Bauer JW, Sepp N, et al. Squamous cell

carcinoma in junctional and dystrophic

epidermolysis bullosa

. Acta Derm Venereol . 2001;81 (3):189-192 .

15

. Ardabili M, Gambichler T, Rotterdam S,

Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K, Stücker M. Metastatic

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma arising from a

previous area of chronic hypertrophic lichen planus.

Dermatol Online J . 2003;9(1):10 .

16

. Ozçelik D, Tatlidede S, Hacikerim S, Uğurlu K,

Atay M. The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in

squamous cell carcinoma of the foot: a case report.

J Foot Ankle Surg . 2004;43(1):60-63 .

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma on the Head and Neck

Original Investigation

Research

jamaotolaryngology.com

(Reprinted)

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Published online July 20, 2016

117