Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  203 / 220 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 220 Next Page
Page Background

ascertainment system through the North Carolina Central Can-

cer Registry and by contacting cancer registrars at 54 hospitals

in the 46 counties during the study period. To be eligible as

cases, subjects had to have received a diagnosis of first primary

invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (International

Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3rd Edition, topography

codes C32.0–C32.9) or oral cavity or pharynx (codes C0.00–

C14.8). The study enrolled 1,396 controls who were frequency-

matched to cases on age, race, and sex using stratified random

sampling. Controls were identified through the North Carolina

Department of Motor Vehicle records as residents of the study

region aged 20 to 80 years old who had never received a diagno-

sis of HNSCC. The study collected questionnaire data. Due to

the sparse numbers, the present analysis excluded 28 cases and

18 controls whose race was not white or black.

The institutional review board at the University of North

Carolina at Chapel Hill approved the protocol. All subjects pro-

vided informed consent.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Measures

Gastroesophageal reflux disease exposure was assessed

via two different questionnaire items administered in-person by

a nurse-interviewer within 2 months of diagnosis. The first

question, considered a measure of self-reported GERD symp-

toms, was: “Were you ever bothered by frequent heartburn?”

The second question, considered a measure of medical diagno-

sis, was: “Did your doctor ever tell you that you had GERD?”

Both items were answered “yes,” “no,” “refused,” “don’t know,”

or were recorded as missing. For purposes of analysis, we

recoded responses of “refused” or “don’t know” as missing.

Covariates

Variables that were considered to be common causes of

GERD and HNSCC incidence were selected a priori to include

as confounders in multivariable models. All covariates were

measured at baseline interview. These included age (categorized

as 20–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–80), sex, race

(white or black), years smoked cigarettes (never smoker, 1–19

years, 20–39 years, 40–49 years, and 50

1

years), lifetime alco-

hol consumption as described previously (never had alcohol;

<

11,232 mL; 11,232-

<

204,469 mL; 204,469-

<

927,946 mL;

927,946

1

mL),

12

body mass index (

<

18.5, 18.5–

<

25.0, 25.0–

<

30.0, and 30.0

1

), and education (less than high school, high

school graduate/vocational training/technical training, and at

least some college).

To assign alcohol consumption status for the subgroup

analysis by joint alcohol consumption and smoking history sta-

tus, alcohol consumption was measured in terms of 12-ounce

beers, 5-ounce wines, and 1.5-ounce hard liquors per week to

more closely approximate the definition of Langevin et al.

6

Outcomes

Case-control status was the outcome variable. Some analy-

ses examined the associations with overall case-control status

(any HNSCC case vs. controls), whereas others examined the

associations with specific HNSCC tumor sites (laryngeal, hypo-

pharyngeal, oropharyngeal, or oral cavity) compared to controls.

Further analyses combined hypopharyngeal and oropharyngeal

cases into overall pharyngeal cases and compared them to con-

trols. Subgroup analyses by joint alcohol consumption and

smoking status compared combined laryngeal and pharyngeal

cases (i.e., laryngopharyngeal cases) to controls.

The CHANCE enrolled 251 cases designated as not other-

wise specified (NOS), that is, those whose tumors could not be

assigned to a particular tumor site. Of these, 247 cases were eli-

gible for inclusion in the present analysis. We included NOS

cases in the overall case-control status variable but excluded

them from tumor site-specific analyses.

Statistical Analysis

Distributions of all variables included in statistical models

were computed as frequencies and percentages for overall cases,

tumor site-specific cases, and controls. The covariate distribu-

tions of overall HNSCC cases and controls were compared using

chi-square tests.

To evaluate associations between GERD and overall case-

control status, we used standard unconditional logistic regres-

sion for a dichotomous outcome to estimate odds ratios (OR)

and 95% confidence interval (CI). For analyses of relationships

between GERD and specific tumor sites, we used polytomous

logistic regression to compare each of laryngeal, hypopharyng-

eal, oropharyngeal, overall pharyngeal, or oral cavity cases,

respectively, to controls. Different multilevel tumor site varia-

bles were constructed to include, on the one hand, hypophar-

yngeal and oropharyngeal cases as separate categories, and on

the other hand, overall pharyngeal cases.

To allow comparison with the study by Langevin et al.,

6

we conducted an analysis of GERD with joint stratification by

alcohol consumption and smoking history comparing laryngeal

and pharyngeal cases combined to controls. Similar to the Lan-

gevin study, heavy drinkers were defined as those consuming

more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week. One alcoholic drink

was defined as, equivalently, 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of

wine, or 1.5 ounces of hard liquor. Also per Langevin et al.,

heavy smokers were defined as subjects with more than 18.3

pack-years of cigarette use.

Every model adjusted for all of the confounders described

above. In addition, to account for the CHANCE frequency

matching, each model adjusted for 2-way and 3-way interaction

terms between the matching factors of age, sex, and race. Each

model excluded subjects with incomplete information.

P

values less than 0.05 were considered statistically signif-

icant. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Insti-

tute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

The study population included 1,340 head and neck

cancer cases and 1,378 controls. The site distribution for

cases was as follows: 473 larynx, 361 oropharynx, 192

oral cavity, 67 hypopharynx, and 247 not-otherwise-

specified site. Table I presents descriptive statistics for

subject characteristics. Relative to controls, HNSCC

cases smoked for a greater number of years, had greater

lifetime alcohol consumption, and were less likely to

have attended college. In this univariate analysis, we

found no differences between cases and controls in terms

of whether they self-reported having had GERD symp-

toms or received a medical diagnosis of GERD.

Using multivariable modeling, we found no associa-

tions between self-reported history of GERD symptoms

and case-control status, either for overall case-control

status or for specific tumor sites (Table II). Most of the

ORs showed that cases had moderately decreased odds

of exposure compared to controls. The OR for hypophar-

yngeal cancer showed an almost 50% increase in odds.

Laryngoscope 126: May 2016

Busch et al.: GERD and Head and Neck Cancer

183