Previous Page  108 / 436 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 108 / 436 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

' APRIL 1990

his status changes, he is no longer

a negotiator but a witness on oath.

There is no room for two standards

here. A lay witness who con-

sciously distorts the facts commits

perjury. In the same way an expert

witness who, from any motive,

states an opinion which he does

not genuinely hold, also commits

perjury.

" . . . the expert witness

differs from the lay witness in

that . . . he is permitted . . . to

include in his evidence the

opinion he has formed

The expert witness will, of

course, have done a lot of home-

work before the actual hearing of

the case. Let us look at what the

valuer for the Local Authority

should do. Firstly, he will inspect

the site armed with a map and will

note all the relevant physical

characteristics. He will check the

zoning with the planning officer

and see whether the land is

affected by road widening or some

such burden. He will arrange that

the engineers check out the

physical development problems. He

will get details of comparable sales,

inspect the properties concerned

and, if at all possible, verify at first

hand the details of the trans-

actions. He will then re-inspect the

site, prepare his valuation and

incorporate his findings and his

conclusions in a Proof of Evidence.

Lastly the expert should get in

touch with his opposite number

and agree as much as possible with

him so that, at the subsequent

hearing, time is not wasted proving

points which are not at issue, i.e.

the cost of a wall is in dispute. It

should be possible to agree the

height and length or even a

" . . . the expert should get in

touch with his opposite

number and agree as much as

possible with him

specification. One important point:

where a dimension or an area or

any ascertainable fact is material to

the case the witness should check

it himself and, if possible, on the

ground. It should be kept in mind

that any step taken in the course of

a job may have to be justified

long

afterwards

to a third party and

that anything written down or left

unrecorded may be exposed to

examination and criticism. He

should never rely on what someone

else has told him, nor should he

assume that a fact is true just

because it is recited in an official

document.

I give you two examples: an

engineer being cross-examined on

drainage problems relating to a

proposed housing development,

being questioned as to why he saw

no problem with drainage when the

Local Authority plan showed clearly

that he could not get into their

sewer because of the invert level.

His reply was that the invert level

was " V " and so was readily

accessible, he had measured it

again yesterday as he felt this was

a matter that might be contro-

versial. On another occasion an

expert witness was asked the date

of the Development Plan from

which he was quoting. He looked

at the front page for the answer

which of course was not there.

Attention to the smallest detail

always pays off.

I referred to the proof of evi-

dence. This is a written statement,

prepared by the witness in advance

of the hearing, of what he intends

to say in the witness box. It is

generally prepared for the informa-

tion of counsel who is to call him,

but in arbitrations it takes the form

of a Precis of Evidence which the

witness will hand to the arbitrator

when he takes the stand, and a

copy will be furnished to the other

side. It should contain all the salient

facts and conclusions and the wit-

ness will have the opportunity of

elaborating on it when giving evi-

ISLE OF MAN & TURKS

8c CAICOS ISLANDS

MESSRS SAMUEL Mc CLEERY

Solicitors, Attorneys-at-Law of the Turks

and Caicos Islands, Registered Legal prac-

ttoners in the Isle of Man of 1 Castle

Street,Castletown, Isle of Man, will be

pleased to accept instructions by their

senior resident partner, Mr. Samuel

MoCleery from Irish Solicitors in the forma-

tion of resident and non-resident I.O.M.

Companies and exempt Turks and Caicos

Island Companies.

Irish Office.

26 South Frederick Street, Dublin 2.

Telephone: 01 -760780 Fax: 01 -764037.

I

.O.M. Office:

Telephone : 0624-822210

Tefex : 628285.

Fax : 0624-823799

London Office:

Telephone : 01 -8317761

Telex : 297100 Fax : 01-8317485.

dence. It serves a number of pur-

poses. It ensures that his Counsel

will know the evidence he is going

to give, and that he does not leave

out anything of importance; it gives

the Arbitrator a record of the main

points of the evidence, without

having to write it all down

laboriously in longhand and it helps

the opposing side to assimilate

quickly what the burden of his

evidence is, and gives them a

record of it. As well as the facts we

referred to before, the Proof should

state clearly the Witness's name,

professional qualifications and

position. It can be very irritating

having to check through docu-

ments some time later in an

attempt to identify otherwise

anonymous reports.

Next we will deal with such

items as maps and photographs. In

the nature of things, during the

course of an Arbitration, the num-

"[An expert witness] should

never rely on what someone

else has told him

ber of maps and plans put in in

evidence tends to proliferate, and

the unfortunate Arbitrator will have

to sort the lot out when he gets

back to his office and starts to sift

the evidence. It goes without say-

ing that any map or plan submitted

should have a title, scale and a

north point. It will be helpful if the

title is also shown so that it is

legible when the map is folded.

Colouring should also be bold and

where possible as much informa-

tion as possible should be shown

on one map e.g. the subject

property outlined boldly in red, road

improvement line in blue, line of

sewer and nearest manhole in

green etc. So often this vital

information will be shown on three

different maps, where for instance

the particular evidence might have

been given by engineers from

different disciplines or depart-

ments.

Some Counsel like to have

numerous photographs put in in

evidence. Normally photographs

are not necessary unless, for in-

stance, in a case where the

premises have been demolished

between the Notice to Treat and

the hearing or a new road built or

some such circumstance. Where

they are put in they should be

numbered on the face of the photo-

92