Previous Page  175 / 436 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 175 / 436 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

A

PRIL

1990

In

this

Issue

Viewpoint 159

Does the Irish Criminal

Justice System work?

161

From the President 167 Practice Notes 168

Solicitors Costs

171

Irish Solicitors in London

Bar Association's

Second Charity Ball 175

People & Places

176

Younger Members News 178

Safety, Health and Welfare

at Work Act, 1989

Lawbrief

Correspondence

Book Reviews

Professional Information

180

183

187

189

194

*

Executive Editor:

Mary Gaynor

Committee:

Eamonn G. Hall, Chairman

Michael V. O'Mahony, Vice-Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Patrick McMahon

Charles R. M. Meredith

Daire Murphy

John Schutte

Advertising:

Seán Ó hOisín. Telephone: 305236

Fax: 307860

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.

*

The views expressed in this publication,

save where otherwise indicated, are the

views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of

the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in

this publication does not necessarily

indicate approval by the Society for the

product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Tel.: 710711.

Telex: 31219.

Fax: 710704.

GAZETT

INCORPORATE D

LAW SOCIETY

OF IRELAND

Vol.84 No.5 June

1990

Viewpoint

That the horrors of the Ceaucescu

Regime should lead to the high-

lighting of a serious lacuna in Irish

Family Law is yet another example

of what a small village our globe

has become. The discovery of

hundreds, if not thousands, of

orphans languishing in institutions

where most inadequate care was

available has brought forth a wave

of sympathy. A number of Irish

couples have sought to adopt some

of these unfortunate children and

have, no doubt to their great

surprise, discovered that Irish Law

is seriously lacking in this area.

"Foreign Adoptions" fall into two

distinct categories. The first where

the adoptive parents go through

the formalities of an adoption in a

foreign jurisdiction and comply fully

with the requirements of that juris-

diction. There are no formal means

of recognition in Ireland for such

adoptions.

The other category is where the

adoptive parents, perhaps due to

the absence of any proper adoption

procedures in some third world

countries, arrange what can only

be called an informal adoption and

bring a child back to ireland. They

will have extreme difficulty in

having that adoption recognised in

this jurisdiction. Even assuming

that they meet the criteria of our

Adoption Board and receive satis-

factory reports from an appropriate

Adoption Society or local authority,

there would be serious difficulties

in persuading the Board that the

necessary consents have been

obtained from the natural mother.

As the Law Reform Commis-

sion's recent Report on the Recog-

nition of Foreign Adoption Decrees

points out, even the first of these

categories presents considerable

difficulties. It might have been

thought that it would be easy to

draw up a list of "first world

countries" whose adoption pro-

cedures might have been assumed

to be similar to ours. Unfortunately

it is the position that some of these

countries permit adoption in cir-

cumstances which would not be in

accordance with our legislation.

Some permit unmarried persons to

adopt. Some permit adults to be

adopted. Others have no restriction

on the adoption of legitimate

children. It was for that reason that

the Commission in its Report rec-

ommended giving the Minister for

Health power to designate individ-

ual countries whose adoption

orders would be recognised in

Ireland.

The Commission also recom-

mended that the High Court be

given jurisdiction to make a declar-

ation that an applicant is or is not

the adopted child of a named

person by virtue of a foreign

adoption. This would be in ease of

persons adopted in a jurisdiction

where some of its adoption rules

might be similar to Irish ones but

others differ.

The Commission was not of

course considering the more

difficult problem of "Third World"

adoptions where it is doubtful

whether adoption procedures of a

quality which either our Minister or

our Courts would be likely to

approve exist.

Is there then to be no way in

which adoptive parents can ensure

the proper legal status of children

whom they have, in all good faith,

brought from a Third World country

to Ireland? There are few more

difficult problems than that of Third

World adoptions. Many would

argue that the success of such

adoptions must be doubtful given

the serious culture clash between

the adoptive parents and the child.

On the other hand it has to be

admitted that not all the children of

mono-cultural marriages avoid

serious psychological problems.

One of the strongest arguments

for instituting a regime which

would permit Irish adoptive parents

to go through adoption procedures

in Ireland is that it may go some

way towards stopping the traffick-

ing in children which is unfor-

tunately a feature particularly of

adoptions of South American

children. This has already been

recommended by the Report of the

Review Committee on Adoption

Services published in 1984. Some

action leading to the introduction of

legislation dealing both with the

recognition of foreign adoptions

and the adoption in Ireland of foreign

children is clearly called for..

159