Previous Page  278 / 436 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 278 / 436 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1990

chapter may perhaps include

reference also to the Commission

rulings in the

Irish Distillers Group

pic

takeover.

It is hoped that future releases

may also refer to some recent

developments in the UK including

the latest chapter in the sagas of

House of Fraser

and

British

Aerospace/Rover

as well as the

application of the judicial review

mechanism (equivalent to that

under Order 84 in Ireland) to the

Take-Over Panel building on such

cases as

Fx p. Datafin

[1987] 1 All

ER 564, CA, and

Ex p. Guinness

[1989] 1 All ER 509, CA, both of

which are considered in the text.

The Fifth Edition of Weinberg &

Blank does not come cheap but it

is indispensable for those dealing

with the subject in the UK or (as in

virtually all cases) having even a

connection with the UK. For the

reasons enumerated above it will

prove of considerable value to Irish

lawyers advising even on purely

domestic cases and its relevance

and usefulness to Irish lawyerswill

increase all the more as the tide of

Companies legislation inspired by

Brussels gathers pace and a fortiori

if there should be a major legislative

reform of financial services in

Ireland as has been advocated by

some.

Patrick J.C. McGovern

I R I SH LAW OF DAMAGES

By J o hn P. White. 2 vols,

IRC80 . 00. Butterworths.

There are now few areas of legal

jurisprudence in this jurisdiction

where the academic or practitioner

cannot turn to an Irish textbook for

guidance. With the publication of

Dr. White's 2 volume work, the

"Irish Law of Damages", this

category is further reduced. Indeed

there has been a virtual deluge of

legal "homegrown" texts produced

in the last few years and it is

important that this area, which for

so many practitioners is a large part

of their practice, is now covered.

Dr. White's approach to the

subject is to divide it into 2

volumes. Broadly Volume 1 is an

examination of the philosophical

tenets which underlie our law of

damages and an analysis of its

range and breadth in the light of

this examination. His approach

might be deemed "academic", in

the perjorative sense, by some

practitioners. However, in order to

grasp the essence of, and to

understand fully, such concepts as

remoteness, foreseeability, and miti-

gation it is imperative to start from

first principles. Too often, it seems,

practitioners leave their jurispru-

dential equipment behind them

when they qualify, feeling it is of

little real relevance or assistance in

their day to day practice. This view

is rightly challenged head on by Dr.

White's work.

He is not afraid to point out areas

where a more coherent approach

should be adopted which would

necessitate, in some cases,

statutory intervention to deal with

glaring injustices and imbalances in

the system. One such area where

he argues for a new approach is

that of recovery for wrongful death.

Having pointed out the injustices

and shortcomings of the current

legal position he presents a coher-

ent, well thought out and con-

structive set of solutions. As he

points out, these may not all be

taken on board by judges but

should start a debate on the subject

and indeed set the agenda for such

a debate.

Volume 2 is a classified guide to

the levels of quantum of damages

for non pecuniary loss arising from

personal injury starting with what

are termed "catastrophic injuries"

such as paraplegia and moving on

to cover injury to various regions

and parts of the human anatomy in

considerable detail. In so doing, Dr.

White has unearthed an amount of

previously unpublished Supreme

Court case law dealing, in parti-

cular, with quantum and the level

of damages then considered

appropriate for different types of

injuries. Such decisions were

largely unavailable when juries

were still involved in personal injury

cases in the High Court owing to

the fact that the views of the

Supreme Court could not be

disclosed to these juries. Dr. White

was allowed access to the

Supreme Court records by the

Chief Justice and has used these

together with the few written

judgments that exist.

The result is to offer real guid-

ance in the task of trying to

establish some parameters for

similar types of injury and the level

of damages which should be

awarded. He is careful to point out

the pre-eminent principles of

having special regard to the

peculiar facts of each case and that

the facts are not fact until so found

by the trial judge.

There will be a need for a con-

stant update of this extremely

valuable guide and it is to be hoped

that Dr. White will devote at least

some of his considerable energies

to this task. What his research does

illustrate is the urgency of a com-

prehensive and up to date system

of reporting of our jurisprudence in

this area as in others. Without this

the system remains open to

accusations of disparity, imbalance

and lack of precision when setting

levels of awards of damages.

Dr. White's work is to be highly

recommended and should be com-

pulsory reading for all lawyers

working in the area.

Geraldine M. Clarke

THE COMMON LAW

TRAD I T I ON

Edited by J . F . McEldowney

and Paul O'Higgins, [Irish

Academic Press. 1990.

248pp. £27.50. Hardback].

Professor Francis Headon Newark,

a former holder of the Chair of Civil

Law in the Queen's University of

Belfast, hoped in 1947 that one day

Ireland might have its Reeves or

Holdsworth: (1947) 7 N.I.L.Q. 121.

However, Professor Newark cor-

rectly noted that it would not be an

easy task to write the legal history

of Ireland. Professor Newark

referred sadly to June 30, 1922,

when the Four Courts was

destroyed with the result that "the

charred remains of the legal records

were literally scattered over the

City of Dublin."

The editors of

The Common Law

Tradition

in their joint essay "The

Common Law tradition and Irish

legal history" in paying tribute to

Professor Paul O'Higgins note that

the O'Higgins Bibliographies help to

destroy the myth that all was lost

in the fire in the Four Courts in

Dublin. The select bibliography in

The Common Law Tradition

further

proves that many fruitful sources

do exist for Irish legal historical

research.

The editors refer to the lack of

legal historical scholarship and

decry the lack of financial and

262