Previous Page  38 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

The Gazette of the Incorporated La* Society of Ireland.

[JULY, 1907

one counsel is entitled to appear on behalf of

each party before a Commission appointed to

take the evidence of a witness.

It is entirely a

matter in the discretion of the Taxing Master,

and we will not interfere with his exercise of

that discretion. As regards the fee of £2

2s:

paid to counsel for attendance on the taxation

of the bill of costs, the Taxing Master had

no authority to allow such fee unless some

question of principle was involved on the tax

ation. The Taxing Master has not stated in

his report that any question of principle was

involved, and we can see none. We therefore

hold that such item must be disallowed."

Reported in I.L.T.R., Vol. XLI., p. 121.

KING'S BENCH DIVISION (ENGLAND).

(Before Darling and A. T. Lawrence, JJ.)

In re a Solicitor; ex parte Hales.

May 9, 1907.—

Undertaking

to pay money—

Receipt of money from client — Undertaking

to

third person — Enforcement — Summary

Order.

THE applicant, who was a solicitor, was owed

certain costs by a client, and the client re

tained the respondent, who was also a solicitor,

to apply for an order for the taxation of the

bill of costs. An order for taxation was made,

and the client, who was an undischarged bank

rupt, placed in the respondent's hands ^£150

to meet the amount of the bill.

The re

spondent wrote to the applicant stating that

the client had placed in his hands the full

amount of the bill, " so that on completion of

the taxation we shall be in a position to pay

the amount certified by the Master due to

you." The applicant, relying on the letter,

did not press on the taxation; and when, upon

the taxation being completed, he applied to

the respondent for payment of the amount

due,

the latter declined

to pay upon

the

ground that the client, who had died, was in

debted

to him for costs.

The applicant

applied for an order on the respondent to pay

the sum due.

Held,

that the letter written by the respon

dent to the plaintiff amounted to a personal

guarantee to pay the sum when found due out

of the money placed in his hands, and consti­

tuted a declaration of trust, on the faith of

which the applicant altered his position, and

the Court would, by a summary order, enforce

payment of the amount by an officer of the

Court.

Reported in T.L.R., Vol. xxiu., p. 573.

' New Rules.

LOCAL REGISTRATION OF TITLE (IRELAND)

ACT, 1891.

THE following new rule under above Act was

published in the

Dublin Gazette

of i4th June,

1907 :—

"It is

this

day ordered by

the Right

Honourable Dodgson Hamilton Madden, one

of the Judges of the King's Bench Division of

the High Court of Justice in Ireland, and

nominated as an additional Land Judge for

the purposes of the Local Registration of Title

(Ireland) Act, 1891, with the approval of the

Right Honourable Sir Samuel Walker, Bart.,

Lord Chancellor of Ireland, that Rule 63 of

the Consolidated Rules of the 24th day of

August, 1896, be amended as follows, viz.:—

By omitting the following portions of the said

rule, namely, from the beginning down to and

including the words ' as he may direct.'

" Approved,

' D. H. MADDEN.

:

S. WALKER, C."

Rule 63 of the rules of the 24th August,

1896, is as follows:—

" No more than four persons shall at any

time be registered as owners of the same land

or charge as joint tenants thereof.

If the

number of persons entitled exceed four, such

of them, not exceeding four, as they may in

writing agree upon shall be registered ; or, in

case they cannot agree, as the central register

ing authority may, upon application, decide

after such notices have been given (if any),

and proceedings

taken, as he may direct.

Where two or more persons are registered as

joint owners of the same lands, or of a charge

thereon, one certificate only of their title to

the land or charge shall be issued by the

registering authority."