Previous Page  46 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

42

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[AUG., 1907

Visit to Ireland of Their Majesties the King

and Queen.

AN Address of Welcome from the Society, on

the occasion of Their Majesties' visit

last

month to Ireland, was presented to Their

Majesties at the Vice-Regal Lodge on the

roth July. The Address was presented by the

President, who was accompanied by the Secre

tary. His Majesty handed to the President a

copy of his general reply to the Addresses

presented.

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1906.

THE Council having obtained the advice of

counsel as to the effect of this Act upon the

division of profits between solicitors out of

costs received by them, intimate to the mem

bers of the Society that counsel are of opinion

that such division of profits between solicitors

may, in certain cases, come within the Act,

and, in order to avoid all questions, the Council

•are of opinion that clients should have notice

of the receipt or payment, as the case m'ay be,

and solicitors should render their accounts or

issue their receipts in such form as will show

that such a division of profits has taken place.

Labourers (Ireland) Act, 1906.

The Joint Committee of members of the

Council of the Society, and of members ap

pointed at the meeting of District Council

Solicitors held in February last, recommend

solicitors who act for District Councils in the

promotion of schemes under the Labourers

(Ireland) Act, 1906, to seek to obtain their

remuneration

from

the District Council by

entering

into agreements with

the District

Council to be paid at the rate of Six pounds

per site, such sum to include the obtaining of

evidence for inquiries, attendances at inquiries,

attendances at Council meetings, attendances

on hearing of appeals, investigation of titles,

and preparation and completion of receipts,

conveyances, and bonds.

Bankruptcy Law Amendment.

THE President of the Society (Mr. William

S. Haves) gave evidence in London, on the

17th July, before the Committee appointed by

the President of the Board of Trade to inquire

into and report on the effect of the provisions

of the laws at present in force in the United

Kingdom in relation to bankruptcy, deeds of

arrangement, and composition by insolvent

debtors with

their creditors, and

the pre

vention and punishment of frauds by debtors

on their creditors, and the points and matters

in which those laws and the procedure and

administration under them require amendment.

Miscellaneous Costs in Administration Suits.

THE Right Hon. the Master of the Rolls, on

the hearing of a matter which came recently

before him on further consideration of the

Chief Clerk's certificate, stated that in future

he would strictly enforce the rule of his Court,

that the Solicitor for the executor or adminis

trator should have in Court on the hearing on

further consideration for presentation to the

Judge, the detailed particulars of any miscel

laneous costs claimed by the executor or

administrator, and that, failing the production

of such detailed bill, no miscellaneous costs

would be allowed.

Recent Decisions affecting Solicitors.

(Noles ofdecisions, whether in reported or unreported

cases, of interest

to Solicitors are invited from

Members.}

COURT OF APPEAL.

(Before Walker, C. ; FitzGibbon and Holmes,

MJO

Allison and Another

v.

Jenkins and Others.

June 4th, 5th, 1907.—

Appeal from an order of

Meredith, M. R.-—Cssts—Taxation—Discretion

of Taxing Master—Right of appeal—Error in

principle—Mistake in fact—Case for counsel to

settle reply—No reply filed—Costs ofregistering

Us 'pendens—Instructionsfor brief-—Instructions

for brief on further consideration — Fee for

advice of proofs

Costs of third counsel

Schedulefor Chief Clerk—Attendances to obtain

copy of a ivill—Surveyor s fee—Copies of docu

ments for counsel with

instructions to

settle

pleadings— Wide line draft statement of claim

for settlement by senior counsel—Or. LXV, r.

65

(2); Appendix S., Part I., items

73

and

i 13

(note).

WHERE a case has been sent to counsel to

consider defences and, if necessary, settle a

reply, the fact that no reply has been filed

does not,

per se,

disentitle a plaintiff to

the

costs of such a case.