Previous Page  64 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 64 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

62

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[DEC., 1907

Government Board, simply to secure business

which legitimately belongs to some one else.

I

cannot think it is in the interest of anyone that

such solicitors should be employed.

You will observe that a Bill was introduced

at the instance of the Recorder of Dublin, to

extend to other actions in his Court powers

which he has in Equity suits, and for other pur

poses, which was approved of, subject to some

modifications in regard to which they were most

fairly met by the Recorder; but, unfortunately,

the Bill was not read a second time.

I gave evidence on behalf of the Society in

London before a Committee, sitting to inquire

into the Bankruptcy Laws, the general line of

my evidence being that 'tis better ' bear those

ills we have than fly to others that we know

not of,' and I don't think you need fear any

immediate legislation for Ireland on the Bank

ruptcy laws, which, as far as T could gather, are

worked on a much better system here than in

England.

We have to mourn the loss of Mr. Daniel

Murray, who was for many years Provincial

delegate from Ulster; and we also deeply re

gret the death of Master Goodman, who was

our special examiner since 1866.

We have this year followed the example of

the English Law Society in issuing a Monthly

Gazette to our members.

It is a new venture,

and I hope it will prove useful. We invite

members to send for publication notes of cases

likely to interest the profession.

There are minor matters in

the

report

which I need not specially refer to. The year

has not been an idle one. For our successes you

have not to thank me, but your Council, who

have been indefatigable in their attention to

the work of the Society ; while the hearty co

operation of your two Vice-Presidents made

my work a pleasure even if at times I felt it

somewhat onerous.

MR. JAMES HENRY, Vice-President, said

it devolved upon him to second the adoption

of the report.

After the very full and lucid

explanation they had got of the report, he

thought it inadvisable that he should go into

it in any detail at all.

He should only - say

that if the Council during the year had done

no other service to the profession than the

restoration of the office of Chief Clerk, and

that of Solicitor to the Inland Revenue, to

the solicitors' profession, it had done a good

year's work.

,MR. GERALD BYRNE said it occurred to

him that the very first paragraph in the report

should be considered by the members of the

solicitors'

profession with great care.

It

showed that out of nearly 1,500 practising

solicitors in Ireland, only 729 are members

of the Society, and, notwithstanding the agi

tation

for alteration

in

the Council made

last May, and again brought forward at this

meeting, less

than half of those members

have availed themselves of the opportunities

of voting for members of the Council of the

coming year. This spoke badly, in his opinion,

for the interest taken by the profession gene

rally in their own affairs.

The commonest

tradesman in the country took more interest

in the management of his affairs than do the

solicitors.

The next part of this report he wished to

touch on was that with which he was closely

connected.

He regretted the Bill which was introduced

by Mr. Harrington, Mr. Gordon, and Mr.

Waldron, to amend the Civil Bill procedure in

the City of Dublin was not given a fair

consideration. Practitioners who are engaged

in

the Recorder's Court of Dublin are fully

conscious of the great difficulties in the way

of collecting honest debts.

He had urged the question of interpleader

over and over again ; and he hoped his efforts

would not be altogether in vain, and that

soon they would have some remedy for this

bad state of affairs.

Again, he would urge the abolition of the

practice whereby through use of a default

process the defendant was supplied with a

notice which he had only to tear off, and

send to the Clerk of the Peace to nullify the

affidavit which had been made by the plaintiff,

who possibly lived miles away, thereby com

pelling the plaintiff if he wished

to get a

decree to attend personally, and give oral

evidence in Court of what had already been

deposed to in his affidavit.

Affidavits should be permitted to be used in

the Court to prove matters such as signatures

to deeds, Bills of Exchange, or matters of

that class, and to render unnecessary

the

attendance of witnesses in Court to prove

them. He considered a seal would, if used bv

a responsible officer, save time, and also that

the limitation for appeal should be four days

from the date of pronouncing the decree, and

not from the termination of the Sessions, which

sometimes

lasted

for a few weeks.

This

should only apply to

the City of Dublin,

because

difficulties might arise where

in

country places solicitors had to go from one

Quarter Sessions district to another, and could