![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0049.jpg)
GAZETTE
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1996
It is envisaged that a significant
number of prisoners in Irish prisons
whose families live in Northern
Ireland will seek to avail of the
transfer-out procedures set out in
Sections 4 and 5 of the Act to secure
a transfer to a prison in Northern
Ireland.
The Minister for Justice is vested with
absolute discretion to grant or refuse
to issue a Warrant for the transfer of a
sentenced prisoner out of the State.
However the Minister must give
reasons in writing whenever she
decides to refuse an application and is
prohibited from discriminating
between applicants in the exercise of
her powers.
Ireland has entered a Reservation
entitling it to limit the excess of
inward over outward transfers in the
light of availability of prison spaces.
Transfer In
In the context of the current peace
process the provisions contained in
sections 6 and 7 of the Act have
received most publicity. They
entitle any Irish prisoner - which
includes any prisoner who has "close
ties" with this country - who has
been sentenced in a Convention
Country to apply for a transfer back
to Ireland to serve the balance of
his sentence.
Of course the Transfer Convention
is not confined to Republican
prisoners but can be invoked by any
sentenced person who fulfils the
criteria outlined above.
It must be remembered that the
Convention and the Act merely confer
a
right to apply
for a transfer back to
Ireland to serve the balance of a
sentence in an Irish prison.
Both the requested State and the Irish
Minister for Justice must agree to the
proposed transfer. Both retain a
discretion under the Transfer
Convention to support or oppose a
Transfer Application.
The request should first be made in
writing to the designated authority in
the sentencing state.
Section 6(2) of the Act facilitates a
request being made directly to the
Minister for Justice from an Irish
prisoner abroad for her consent to his
transfer to Ireland to serve the balance
of his sentence.
If the consent of the two relevant
States is forthcoming, then the
Minister for Justice applies to the
High Court to issue a warrant to
authorise the bringing of the
sentenced person into the State. The
High Court must issue the warrant
once it is satisfied that all the
formalities are complied with and the
proofs are in order.
The Sentence
The Transfer Convention gives this
State the option, where a sentenced
person is being repatriated, to either
continue the operation of the sentence
imposed abroad (the so-called
"Continuation Model"), or, under
Section 7(5), if the sentence imposed
abroad is found by the High Court to
be incompatible with Irish law, that
Court can adapt the sentence to one
more compatible with Irish law for the
offence in question (the so-called
"Conversion Model").
The short-comings in the legislation
are clear from section 7 and include
the following:
a. The sentenced person appears to
have no right under s7 of the Act
to request the High Court to
convert his sentence to one more
compatible with Irish law.
b. The sentenced person appears to
have no right to be heard or
represented in any application by
the Minister for Justice to the
High Court for the issuing of a
Warrant to bring him into the
State and/or the adaptation of his
sentence.
c. The criteria to be applied by the
High Court when deciding
whether to opt for the
Continuation or Conversion
Model of sentence are nowhere
defined, identified or explained.
d. There is no right on the part of a
transferee to be legally aided
under the provisions of the
Criminal Justice (Legal Aid) Act,
1962 or otherwise in relation to
any application to the High Court
under the Act.
e. The anti-discrimination provision,
Section 10(1) is so worded as to
expressly permit discrimination
for ". . . good reason. . ." and also
allows the Minister to take ". . .
into account the operational
requirements of the prison service
and the welfare of the applicant."
f. Where the Minister refuses an
application or consent to a transfer
into or out of this State, Section
10(2) provides that the decision
and grounds for the decision shall
be notified to the applicant or
requesting state, as the case may
be. However, the obligation to
specify reasons arises only ". . .
where practicable and where the
interests of justice do not preclude
so doing."
g. The transferee's rights in relation
to remission of sentence should be
clarified.
Unless a Statutory Instrument is
introduced clarifying the operation of
Section 7 of the Act, one can envisage
it being challenged by transferees who
wish to be heard by the High Court in
relation to the transfer and particularly
in relation to an adaptation of the
sentence imposed by the foreign
Court.
By Declaration, Ireland has excluded
the Application of the procedure
provided for in Article 9. LB of the
Convention in cases when Ireland is
the administering State.
Conclusions
At any time there are estimated to be
about 1,250 Irish-born detainees
serving sentences in prisons, hospitals
and institutions abroad. The hardship
and anguish suffered by their families
at home is immeasurable. In addition
to the inevitable deprivation of liberty,
Irish prisoners abroad are very
susceptible to racism, harassment,
language and cultural isolation,
34