Previous Page  38 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

compete agreement against certain hourly

workers.

While some may believe an employer

should protect its interest as it relates to

a cook by using a confidentiality agree-

ment, it is not implausible to believe that

a non-compete agreement could be used

to accomplish the same protection for

the employer. Employers have a higher

likelihood that a non-compete agreement

will be upheld if the agreement is focused

on preserving customer and supplier rela-

tionships instead of outright denying the

employee from working for a competitor.

What Business Owners and CEOs Should

Know,

Crain’s CustomMedia, http://www.

chicagobusiness.com/section/custom-

content-labor-employment-law.

Conclusion

It is still imperative to remember that, on

both a national and local scale, non-com-

pete agreements are not favored by courts

and the legislature. A 2016 White House

report believes non-compete agreements

reduce job mobility, remove bargaining

power for employees and minimize the

labor pool for other companies. Non-Com-

pete Agreements: Analysis of the Usage,

Potential Issues, and State Reponses (May

2016),

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/

default/files/non-competes_report_final2.

pdf. The U.S. Department of Treasury

also commissioned a report and found

that non-compete agreements lower wage

growth, burden the interests of workers

and are used excessively. Non-Compete

Contracts: Economic Effects and Policy

Implications, Office of Economic Policy,

U.S. Department of the Treasury, March

2016. Consequently, employers should

be proactive and cautious in crafting and

negotiating non-compete agreements.

Engaging in this process will benefit an

employer who hopes to enforce the non-

compete agreement in the future.

Nonetheless, covenants that are now

prohibited under the Act for certain

employees do provide necessary and legiti-

mate business protection for employers. An

employer still has the right to protect its

confidential information and trade secrets.

An employer also has the right to restrict

a departing employee from trying to steal

information, poach clients and solicit other

individuals in other business relationships.

Businesses could see the Act putting Illinois

at a further disadvantage and forcing more

companies to relocate to other states in

hopes of assuring the protection of busi-

ness information and assets. There are clear

reasons why Illinois is consistently ranked

among the worst states in the United States

in which to conduct business. As a result,

a thoughtful balancing of the interests of

both employers and employees is war-

ranted.

With the Act now enforceable in

Illinois, employers contemplating non-

compete agreements for employees making

$13.01 per hour and above should seriously

consider the necessity, purpose, and legality

of a non-compete agreement. Non-com-

pete agreements limit various aspects of

an employee’s opportunities, including the

ability to find new employment, upward

mobility of workers looking for a higher

wage, advancement of an employee with

new skills obtained from a current or previ-

ous employer, and the negotiation power

to demand higher wages with a current or

future employer.

Jimmy John’s,

at 17.

The impact of the Act will likely gain

strength in the coming years. In Chicago,

the minimumwage will increase to $13.00

per hour on July 1, 2019, while Cook

County’s minimum wage will increase to

$13.00 per hour on July 1, 2020. Because

of these minimum wage increases, prac-

titioners can assume that more individu-

als employed in Cook County will earn

wages higher than the $13.00 per hour

rate explicitly mentioned in the Act.

Consequently, the potential exists for a

larger pool of employees to gain protection

from the Act, thus dissuading employers

from entertaining the thought of imple-

menting wide-scale use of non-compete

agreements.

Matthew E. Misichko is an associate in the

Commercial Practices Group at Handler

Thayer, LLP

Nielsen Career

Consulting

Career Counseling

For Attorneys

Strategies and support for

your career in or out of the

law

30 Years of Experience

Over 3500 Clients

Sheila Nielsen, MSW, JD

The Park Monroe

65 E. Monroe St., Ste. 4301

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 340-4433

www.nielsencareerconsulting.com

38

JULY/AUGUST 2017

Pro Bono Support

Are you looking for a pro bono opportunity that

fits your skills, interests and availability? The

CBF Pro Bono Support Program is here to help

connect you to meaningful pro bono volunteer

opportunities that are a good fit for you.To learn

more about potential volunteer opportuni-

ties, go to

www.chicagobarfoundation.org/

resources/pro-bono or Contact Angela Inzano

at 312/554-4952 for assistance getting involved.