Previous Page  53 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

to document downloading, to real-time

editing. Access to the collaborators can

be revoked at any time. Be careful when

sharing confidential documents via online

document storage. A recent decision found

that privilege was waived because a link to

a folder of documents in the cloud, which

was produced via discovery, was sent with

the “anyone with the link can access or

download” permission. The judge likened

it to leaving a box of documents on a

bench. Be sure to share documents and

folders specifically with certain people

versus “anyone with the link can access”,

and/or add password protection the folder.

That way you can be sure that the files

you share are not subsequently available

to others. In most cases this does mean

that the recipient of the link will need to

create a (free) username and password to

access the files, but without that additional

control your firm is trading convenience

for security.

Law Firm Security and Cloud Storage of

Client Files

Law firms using online document storage

services should acquaint themselves with

applicable ethics opinions

(tinyurl.com/

pmh5z2g) and

legislative and regulatory

requirements

(

tinyurl.com/z3avxhw)

that

would affect their decision regarding which

providers meet their needs. Generally the

business plans from many providers have

terms and conditions, privacy policies,

and security protocols that comport more

appropriately with a law firm’s duties of

confidentiality. Depending on the practice

area and the type of data stored, some firms

may require a more expensive plan or a ser-

vice that will offer further security features

including owning the encryption keys,

HIPAA compliance, mobile device man-

agement, device wiping, records retention,

litigation holds, data-loss prevention, and

more. These features will also help a firm

maintain compliance with internal policies

and procedures, such as an acceptable use

policy or remote access policy. While these

features may require a minimum number

of users, it more likely that the product will

simply cost more per user per month and

may well be worth the expense.

continued on page 56

CBA RECORD

53

CBA Signature Series

A Case Study:

Sokolow v. PA

Date:

Tuesday, August 15, 12:00–1:15 pm

Location:

The Chicago Bar Association, 321 South Plymouth Court

Presented by:

CBA and Decalogue Society

MCLE Credit:

1 IL MCLE Credit

Terror is reaching countries that never dreamed they would come under at-

tack. The Israel Law Center is a Tel Aviv non-profit, legal NGO and a leader in

fighting terror in the courtroom worldwide. At The Israel Law Center lawyers

go on the offensive against terror in the courtroom in order to stop the flow of

money and to provide some measure of compensation to the victims.

In February 2015, for example, Rachel Weiser, a senior attorney at The Israel

Law Center, along with local counsel from Arnold & Porter,won a $655 million

dollar verdict in Manhattan Federal court under the Antiterrorism Act.The jury

found the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian Liberation Organization liable

for terror attacks that injured and killed 33 American citizens in Israel during

the second Intifada.

The Israel Law Center has over $2 billion dollars in judgments, has frozen over

$600 million dollars in terror assets and has collected over $200 million for the

victims. Rachel will speak about her work at Shurat HaDin, the Antiterrorism

Act and will conduct a case study on the

Sokolow v. PA

lawsuit.

Our Speaker:

Rachel Weiser, Director of Advocacy Educational Program-

ming, Shurat HaDin. Rachel grew up in Pittsburgh and has been working

as a litigator since graduating from Case Western Reserve University Law

School in 1998. After moving to Israel in 2010 with her husband and 5 chil-

dren, Rachel joined the legal team of Shurat HaDin,where she works on the

organization’s U.S.antiterror cases.Most recently Rachel was part of the trial

team that won Shurat a $655 million dollar jury verdict against the PA and

PLO on behalf of 33 American victims of terror during the second Intifada.

Rachel also runs Shurat HaDin’s biannual law student internship program

and annual lawyer’s seminar.

Special thanks to Clark Hill PLC

Register at

www.chicagobar.org/cle