Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  140 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

Parameter

Method Performance               

Please 

report in units as stated in SMPR!

Weighting 

factor for 

parameter

Suitability Ranking (1‐

3‐5) 

(select from drop‐down 

list, 5 = best)

 SPIFAN matrices

Applicable to all forms of infant, adult, and/or pediatric formula 

(powders, ready‐to‐feed liquids, and liquid concentrates). 

Any combination of milk, soy, rice, whey, hydrolyzed protein, 

starch, and amino acids, with and without intact protein.

The method is applicable to all the matrices listed 

in the SMPR.

1

All analytes defined in the 

applicability statement are 

measured.

1

Analyte 1

trans‐vitamin K1 = 1‐100 mcg/100g recostituted sample

trans‐vitamin K1 = 0.5‐100 mcg/100g 

Analyte 2

cis‐vitamin K1 = 1‐100 mcg/100g recostituted sample

cis‐vitamin K1 = 0.1‐100 mcg/100g 

Analyte 3

Total‐vitamin K1 = 1‐100 mcg/100g recostituted sample

Total‐vitamin K1 = 0.6‐100 mcg/100g 

Analyte 4

Analyte 5

Analyte 1

trans‐vitamin K1 = <1 mcg/100g recostituted sample

trans‐vitamin K1 = 0.5 mcg/100g 

Analyte 2

cis‐vitamin K1 = <1mcg/100g recostituted sample

cis‐vitamin K1 = 0.1/100g 

Analyte 3

Total‐vitamin K1 = <1mcg/100g recostituted sample

Total‐vitamin K1 = 0.6mcg/100g 

Analyte 4

Analyte 5

Spike recovery  (%) Vitamin K1 (cis + trans) = 90‐100%

Vitamin K1 (cis + trans) = 97.8 + 5.2% (n=44)

2

Bias vs SRM NIST SRM 1849a Vitamin K1 = 1.06 + 0.17 mg/Kg

NIST SRM 1849a Vitamin K1 = 1.00 + 0.10 mg/Kg 

(n=5)

3

<8% RSD

<5% RSD

1‐10 mcg/100g

<8% RSD

7.90%

>10 mcg/100g

<5% RSD

6.30%

b   

Units

Analytical Range.

1

Method title:

Principle of the method:

A LC‐MS/MS Method for Vitamin K Analysis in Infant Formula and Adult Nutrition Samples

Fat in sample is hydrolyzed by lipase after adding internal std. Vitamin K is extracted by a solvent extraction. The reconstituted extract is analyzed by LC‐MS/MS for vitamin K.

SMPR Requirement

Evaluation of Method Performance  vs. SMPR requirements.

Feedback from Users of the Method since being awarded 

First Action

Official Methods

 Status

Repeatability (RSDr)

Reproducibility (RSDR)

Accuracy/Recovery

Blank check and lowest and midrange calibration

ADDITIONAL EVALUATION PARAMETERS

Intermediate Reproducibility 

(RSDiR)

Limit of quantification (LOQ)

Method Reference #

VITK‐01

AOAC SMPR: ………….. AOAC SMPR 2014.001

Limit of detection (LOD)

1

a

 Concentrations apply to (1) "ready to feed liquids" "as‐is"; (2) reconstituted powders (25 g into 200 g water); and (3) liquid concentrates diluted 1:1 by weight.

Did Method Author Consider ERP’s Method Specific 

Recommendations 

(See web link to specific method 

comments):

Decision by ERP

Proprietary equipment

Notes:

Overall Score

Recommendation of ERP 

2 years after First Action Status

Laboratory safety

Other Considerations

3

1

2

move to Final Action/repeal/remove/expand 2 year term

0

No unique proprietary equipment/accessories are required.

Method does not require any special safety precautions e.g. personal protection from highly toxic solvents.

Bias against established method 

Analytical equipment

1

Adequate proof of performance via system suitability

Is there a bias Yes/No ?

Analytical equipment is commonly available in most labs.

SPIFAN ERP Checklist v 1.6

27.06.2013

VitK-01 MEF

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE