Background Image
Previous Page  43 / 64 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

41

www.read-wca.com

Wire & Cable ASIA – November/December 2013

Telecom

Fears that American giant Verizon could

snap up spectrum off-limits to Canadian

incumbents heats up a debate on foreign

ownership

Reports that the US carrier Verizon may want to buy Wind

Mobile, and possibly also the struggling Mobilicity, as a way

into Canada’s telecommunications market have agitated

the big three Canadian providers – Bell, Telus and Rogers –

prior to an auction of wireless spectrum in January.

As explained by Canadian Press political journalist Jennifer

Ditchburn in the

Toronto Star

, under the present system

the federal government limits how much spectrum the big

domestic (‘incumbent’) companies can buy up. Intended to

encourage smaller players to come to the table, this policy

would, at least in theory, stimulate competition and put

downward pressure on prices across Canada.

But those smaller players could be bought up by a firm

like Verizon, which might then snap up the spectrum

that is off-limits to the incumbents. Ms Ditchburn wrote:

“Because those big Canadian firms aren’t allowed to bid on

all the spectrum available, that could drive down the size of

auction bids and give Verizon a potentially good deal.”

On 26

th

August the Fraser Institute, a Canadian public policy

think tank, argued in favour of another expedient for healthy

competition in the wireless market: Ottawa should do away

with limits on foreign ownership and other constraints on

domestic telecoms.

A report cited by the

Star

is the work of a senior fellow

at the politically conservative Fraser, who flatly rejects

the assumption that handicapping the incumbents does

anything to promote effective competition in the telecom

sector. Wrote Steven Globerman: “Preventing large

incumbent carriers from restricting competition can and

should be addressed through the federal Competition Act

rather than by such means as spectrum auction caps.”

In Mr Globerman’s view, getting rid of the remaining barriers

to foreign entrants into the Canadian marketplace would

induce a more beneficial fear: that of hostile takeovers,

with their powerful incentive to the Canadian incumbents to

remake themselves for greater efficiency.

As of Ms Ditchburn’s writing, it appeared that the

incumbents had no intention of retooling either their

fears or their perceived major adversary. The big three

telecoms launched a “Fair for Canada” campaign and

have taken out full-page ads asserting that Verizon

would be getting preferential treatment under the current

auction rules.

A strongly contrarian “Real Fair for Canada” campaign

promptly sprang up, and issued the following challenge

to ‘Robellus’ — the Canadian incumbents Rogers, Bell

and Telus. (‘Dear Robellus: Let’s get real,’ 30

th

August):

- You have over 90 per cent of the wireless spectrum

already. How can you justify wanting more? How can

you even pretend that that is fair to ANY new player?

- Why would your loyal customers whom you treat

with respect and never overcharge leave you for

Verizon?

- You have just raised your plan rates by 40 per cent

for basically nothing, so why would we nag the

government to help you hurt consumers even more?

- If you run your companies so efficiently and are really

ready for competition, then why is it you only operate

in Canada?

- Money doesn’t grow in some magical orchard that

you own. It comes out of our pockets. But you learned

that in business school...[we] hope.

Energy

Quieter-running wind turbines might

deliver an incidental energy benefit

“Noise created by giant wind turbines is high on the list

of barriers to renewable energy deployment, with NIMBY

(‘Not in my backyard!’) and health complaints threatening or

at least delaying a number of projects around the world.”

Writing in

IEEE Spectrum

, a journal of the Institute of

Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Dave Levitan went on

to note that noise is also related to energy efficiency. In a

development he deems a ‘win all around, apparently,’ the

research division for turbine manufacturing giant GE says

it has devised a method of reducing noise and boosting

output from the wind turbines.

Working with Sandia National Laboratories in

Albuquerque, New Mexico, on noise abatement, GE

Wind Energy (Fairfield, Connecticut) utilised the Red

Mesa supercomputer which, when it began operations

in 2010, reached speeds of 500 teraflops that made it

the tenth-fastest computer in the world. [Editor’s note:

“Teraflops” is not a typo. A teraflop is a measure of

computing speed equal to one trillion floating-point

operations per second.]

At Sandia, GE said, the Red Mesa was set to run a

program (high-fidelity large eddy simulation), created by

Stanford University (California), for projecting detailed

fluid dynamic phenomena and resulting wind blade noise.

(‘Supercomputing a Quieter Wind Turbine,’ 19

th

August).

After three months of monitoring these runs, the

researchers believed they had gained “valuable insights that

were used to assess current engineering design models,

the assumptions they make that most impact noise

predictions, and the accuracy and reliability of model

choices.”

While pronouncing this “a bit vague,” Mr Levitan was able

to report a promising result from the experiment. According

to GE, a turbine rotor design that is quieter by one decibel

equates to a two per cent increase in annual energy yield.

With 240 gigaWatts (gW) of wind power forecast to

be installed around the world over the next five years,

that two per cent increase could in fact be worth five

gigaWatts.

Statue of Liberty Image from BigStockPhoto.com

Photographer: Marty