Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  231 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 231 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans

231

3.

Is “attributable to” the participant’s being totally disabled (as defined in § 72(m)(7); see

9.4.02 )

; or

4.

Is a “qualified special purpose distribution,”

i.e.,

a distribution of up to $10,000 for certain

purchases of a “first home.”

§ 408A(d)(2)(A)(iv) , (5) ; § 72(t)(2)(F) , (8) ;

see

¶ 9.4.09 .

These conditions for a qualified distribution from a Roth IRA resemble the requirements

for avoiding the 10 percent “early distributions” penalty of

§ 72(t) (¶ 5.5) ,

but are not identical.

For example, withdrawals from a Roth IRA to pay higher education expenses are not qualified

distributions, even though such withdrawals from an IRA are exempt from the 10 percent penalty

( ¶ 9.4.08 )

.

Note that certain distributions probably or definitely can NOT be qualified distributions,

even if the Five-Year Period and triggering event requirements are met:

Corrective distributions.

If various requirements are met, an IRA (or Roth IRA)

contribution that is returned (together with any earnings thereon) to the contributor by a

certain deadline is deemed never to have been contributed; see

¶ 2.1.08

regarding such

“corrective distributions.” The “earnings” distributed along with a returned IRA

contribution cannot be a qualified distribution, and therefore will be taxable (and will be

subject to the 10% penalty if the individual is under age 59½ and no exception applies).

Reg

. § 1.408A-6 ,

A-1(d). The IRS might apply this principle to the earnings on any excess

Roth IRA contribution, regardless of whether the excess contribution was returned to the

contributor as part of a corrective distribution, although the IRS has made no

pronouncement on this subject to date; see

¶ 5.1.02 .

Prohibited transactions.

Engaging in a prohibited transaction with a Roth IRA causes the

account to lose its exempt status, and to be deemed to be entirely distributed as of the first

day of the year in which the prohibited transaction occurs.

§ 408(e) ; § 408A(a) ;

Reg.

§ 1.408A-1 ,

A-1(b). Since the deemed distribution is coming from an account that no longer

qualifies as a Roth IRA, it is presumably not a qualified distribution, though the regulations

do not explicitly say that. Compare Reg.

§ 1.402A-1 ,

A-11

( ¶ 5.7.04 (

C)) which does

explicitly say that the income resulting from engaging in a prohibited transaction with a

DRAC cannot be a qualified distribution.

5.2.05

Computing Five-Year Period for qualified distributions

Satisfying a five-year waiting period (called in this book “the Five-Year Period”) is one of

two tests a Roth IRA owner must pass in order to have tax-free “qualified distributions”

( ¶ 5.2.04 )

from his Roth IRA.

A.

Five-Year Period for participant.

The Five-Year Period (called in the statute the

nonexclusion period

”) for all of a participant’s Roth IRAs begins on January 1 of the

first year for which a contribution was made to any Roth IRA maintained for that

participant.

§ 408A(d)(2)(B) ;

Reg.

§ 1.408A-6 ,

A-2.

Fred Example:

On May 3, 1999, Fred put $1,000 into his Roth IRA. Fred’s Five-Year Period

starts January 1, 1999, and is completed on December 31, 2003. The first year in which he can

possibly have a qualified distribution is 2004. If he makes further contributions (either regular or

rollover) to the same (or any other) Roth IRA, those contributions do NOT start a new Five-Year

Period running. In 2006, Fred converts his $100,000 traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. This new Roth