Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans
263
money; the IRS calls this the “earnings”). Hopefully, the “earnings” will NEVER be taxed, because
they will come out eventually in the form of a tax-free qualified distribution
( ¶ 5.7.04 ).
But if there is a nonqualified distribution, the earnings cannot come out tax-free.
Accordingly, we need to determine how much of any nonqualified distribution represents a return
of the participant’s basis (tax-free) and how much is considered earnings (taxable), and here’s
where we find the difference between Roth IRAs and DRACs. With a Roth IRA, the participant’s
own contributions (
i.e.,
the after-tax money) come out first.
¶ 5.2.06 , ¶ 5.2.07 .Accordingly, even
nonqualified Roth IRA distributions are income tax-free until the entire basis has been distributed.
With DRACs, in contrast, there is no special rule allowing the participant’s basis to come
out first. So, the regular rule of
§ 72(e)(8)will apply—the “cream-in-the-coffee rule,” under which
any distribution carries out proportionate amounts of the participant’s basis (after-tax money) and
earnings (pretax money). Reg.
§ 1.402A-1, A-3; see
¶ 2.2.02 .Thus, every nonqualified
distribution from a DRAC will be partly taxable unless either (1) there has been no appreciation
in the account since the original contributions or (2) the earnings portion is rolled over
( ¶ 5.7.06 ).
The participant’s DRAC is treated as a separate account from the participant’s traditional
accounts in the plan for purposes of applying
§ 72 . § 402A(d)(4) .Thus, distributions can be taken
from each category (traditional or Roth) separately, without their being aggregated for purposes of
the “cream-in-the-coffee rule.”
However, if the participant has more than one DRAC inside a single 401(k) plan (for
example, an elective deferral account and a rollover account), these are treated as a single account
for purposes of
§ 72 .Reg.
§ 1.402A-1, A-9(a). The only exceptions to this are: If an account is
divided between the participant and his spouse pursuant to a QDRO, each spouse’s share of the
employee’s DRAC is treated as a separate account (or “separate contract,” in the lingo o
f § 72 ;see
¶ 2.2.04 (C)); and, the plan can split the DRAC into multiple separate accounts for the participant’s
multiple beneficiaries after the participant’s death, and each such account will be treated as a
separate “contract” under
§ 72 .Reg.
§ 1.402A-1 ,A-9(b).
5.7.06
Rollovers of DRAC distributions: General rules
A distribution from a DRAC may be rolled over only to another DRAC or to a Roth IRA.
§ 402A(c)(3) ;Reg.
§ 1.402A-1, A-5(a). See
¶ 5.7.07for the rules for DRAC-to-DRAC rollovers,
¶ 5.7.08for DRAC-to-Roth IRA rollovers.
Though both direct rollovers and indirect (60-day) rollovers are permitted (se
e ¶ 2.6.01for
the difference), different rules apply to these two types of rollovers:
If a DRAC pays a distribution from the participant’s account directly to another DRAC
(trustee-to-trustee transfer or direct rollover), that is treated as a separate distribution from
“any amount paid directly to the employee,” for purposes of determining how much of
each of these “separate distributions” is after-tax money and how much is pretax money.
Reg.
§ 1.402A-1, A-5(a), third sentence; A-6(a). Although this regulation addresses only
direct rollovers from one DRAC to another, Notice 2009-68, 2009-39 IRB 423, at p. 429,
provides the same rule for rollovers from any QRP to any other eligible retirement plan;
see
¶ 2.2.04 (A).
If a distribution is paid to the participant (rather than being rolled directly to another plan
or IRA), and the participant rolls over only part of the distribution (using a 60-day rollover),