Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  263 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 263 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans

263

money; the IRS calls this the “earnings”). Hopefully, the “earnings” will NEVER be taxed, because

they will come out eventually in the form of a tax-free qualified distribution

( ¶ 5.7.04 )

.

But if there is a nonqualified distribution, the earnings cannot come out tax-free.

Accordingly, we need to determine how much of any nonqualified distribution represents a return

of the participant’s basis (tax-free) and how much is considered earnings (taxable), and here’s

where we find the difference between Roth IRAs and DRACs. With a Roth IRA, the participant’s

own contributions (

i.e.,

the after-tax money) come out first.

¶ 5.2.06 , ¶ 5.2.07 .

Accordingly, even

nonqualified Roth IRA distributions are income tax-free until the entire basis has been distributed.

With DRACs, in contrast, there is no special rule allowing the participant’s basis to come

out first. So, the regular rule of

§ 72(e)(8)

will apply—the “cream-in-the-coffee rule,” under which

any distribution carries out proportionate amounts of the participant’s basis (after-tax money) and

earnings (pretax money). Reg.

§ 1.402A-1

, A-3; see

¶ 2.2.02 .

Thus, every nonqualified

distribution from a DRAC will be partly taxable unless either (1) there has been no appreciation

in the account since the original contributions or (2) the earnings portion is rolled over

( ¶ 5.7.06 )

.

The participant’s DRAC is treated as a separate account from the participant’s traditional

accounts in the plan for purposes of applying

§ 72 . § 402A(d)(4) .

Thus, distributions can be taken

from each category (traditional or Roth) separately, without their being aggregated for purposes of

the “cream-in-the-coffee rule.”

However, if the participant has more than one DRAC inside a single 401(k) plan (for

example, an elective deferral account and a rollover account), these are treated as a single account

for purposes of

§ 72 .

Reg.

§ 1.402A-1

, A-9(a). The only exceptions to this are: If an account is

divided between the participant and his spouse pursuant to a QDRO, each spouse’s share of the

employee’s DRAC is treated as a separate account (or “separate contract,” in the lingo o

f § 72 ;

see

¶ 2.2.04 (

C)); and, the plan can split the DRAC into multiple separate accounts for the participant’s

multiple beneficiaries after the participant’s death, and each such account will be treated as a

separate “contract” under

§ 72 .

Reg.

§ 1.402A-1 ,

A-9(b).

5.7.06

Rollovers of DRAC distributions: General rules

A distribution from a DRAC may be rolled over only to another DRAC or to a Roth IRA.

§ 402A(c)(3) ;

Reg.

§ 1.402A-1

, A-5(a). See

¶ 5.7.07

for the rules for DRAC-to-DRAC rollovers,

¶ 5.7.08

for DRAC-to-Roth IRA rollovers.

Though both direct rollovers and indirect (60-day) rollovers are permitted (se

e ¶ 2.6.01

for

the difference), different rules apply to these two types of rollovers:

If a DRAC pays a distribution from the participant’s account directly to another DRAC

(trustee-to-trustee transfer or direct rollover), that is treated as a separate distribution from

“any amount paid directly to the employee,” for purposes of determining how much of

each of these “separate distributions” is after-tax money and how much is pretax money.

Reg.

§ 1.402A-1

, A-5(a), third sentence; A-6(a). Although this regulation addresses only

direct rollovers from one DRAC to another, Notice 2009-68, 2009-39 IRB 423, at p. 429,

provides the same rule for rollovers from any QRP to any other eligible retirement plan;

see

¶ 2.2.04 (

A).

If a distribution is paid to the participant (rather than being rolled directly to another plan

or IRA), and the participant rolls over only part of the distribution (using a 60-day rollover),