Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  271 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 271 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans

271

convert nothing. Perhaps Roth lovers and Roth haters should both consider partial Roth

conversions.

5.8.02

Factors that incline towards doing a Roth conversion

Here are factors that can tilt the balance in favor of a Roth conversion.

A.

If conversion is “cheap” or “free.”

Whether a Roth conversion will “make a profit”

involves a cost-benefit analysis. If the cost is zero the decision is easy—there are only

benefits. Similarly, if the cost is very low, the benefits do not have to clear a very high

hurdle for the Roth conversion to win the contest. This factor makes the Roth conversion

decision easy for an individual who is in a zero tax bracket temporarily (due, for example,

to a net operating loss from a business). This factor also tends to make the Roth conversion

favorable if the plan to be converted consists substantially of “after-tax money.”

B.

Future tax rate expected to be higher.

This factor favors a Roth conversion for a person

whose personal tax rate is likely to go higher in the foreseeable future, either because of

changes in his personal circumstances or because a general future tax increase is likely to

apply to him.

For example, a retiree whose annual gross income (including investment income and

retirement plan distributions) is likely to exceed $250,000 (in the case of a married individual;

$200,000 for a single person) in future years will be subject to the 3.8 percent surtax on investment

income after 2012 (see

¶ 2.1.02 )

, resulting in a marginal tax rate of 43.6 percent on such income.

A Roth conversion at the 2010 top marginal rate of 35 percent could benefit this client. Since

qualified Roth IRA distributions do not increase gross income, converting to a Roth could help

keep the client’s future gross income below the threshold that would trigger the expected top future

tax rate.

Another example: When a married person dies, the surviving spouse often will continue to

receive almost as much income as the couple received while both were living, but the tax rates

applicable to that income will sharply increase when the surviving spouse is filing as a single

individual compared with the “married filing jointly” rates that previously applied. This prospect

could encourage a married couple to start doing Roth conversions while both are living, especially

if one of them is not healthy.

This factor is also at work in setting up Roth IRAs for young family members

( ¶ 5.8.06 (

C))

and when a low-income parent converts to a Roth for the benefit of high-income heirs

( 5.8.04 (

B)).

C.

Participant does not want or need RMDs.

Money can stay in a Roth IRA much longer

than in a traditional IRA, because of the different minimum distribution rules that apply

( 5.2.02 (

A)). This factor makes Roth IRAs attractive to individuals who would prefer to

preserve their IRAs intact for heirs, or who do not want to deal with the annual hassle and

penalty risk of RMDs.

D.

Spend down “outside” assets.

An individual concerned about potential creditors’ claims

should consider the relative vulnerability of his assets outside vs. inside an IRA. If (based

on the configuration of his assets, the nature of the potential claims, and applicable state or