Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

394 / 507

394 Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits
(c)(2)(A)(I). The Tax Court accepted the IRS view in Taproot Administrative Services, Inc. v.
Comm’r, 133 T.C. No. 9 (9/29/09).
The Code has a corrective procedure allowing S corp. status to be restored when it is lost
inadvertently. § 1362(f). For how an IRA owner can use this procedure to correct inadvertent loss
of S corp. status through transfer of S corp. stock into an IRA or Roth IRA, see PLRs 2008-07022,
2009-06015, 2009-15020, 2009-17008, 2009-31039, and 2009-40013.
D. Real estate. Real estate can trigger the same titling problems as hedge funds (see “B”).
Direct ownership of real estate by an IRA also has pitfalls of its own. One is the need to
buy the property inside the IRA; the participant cannot buy the property outside the IRA
and then later contribute the property to the IRA (noncash contribution; A)) or sell
it to the IRA (prohibited transaction; B)). Another problem is personal use of the
IRA-owned real estate (IRA owner and his family vacation in the IRA-owned ski chalet,
for example), an obvious “prohibited transaction” B)).
Another pitfall is commingling of funds. If the IRA owner uses his personal funds to pay
expenses associated with the IRA-owned property, that would presumably be considered a
contribution to the IRA, which may create an excess contribution problem (see . If the
IRA owner tries to treat such payments as advances, and repays himself out of IRA funds, he either
has a taxable distribution or an IRA-disqualifying prohibited transaction (loan; B)).
Any shared ownership or expense-sharing between the IRA and the IRA owner in his
personal capacity creates prohibited transaction potential.
If the IRA owner works on the IRA-owned real estate (for example painting the place on
the weekend), thus contributing “sweat equity,” he becomes vulnerable to several possible lines of
IRS attack: Disqualifying the IRA for accepting noncash contributions ; reallocation
of the IRA’s “income” from sale or rental of the property to the IRA owner’s personal return (with
resulting penalties for failure to report such income) (see § 482), followed by deemed contribution
of the re-allocated income to the IRA (excess IRA contribution penalty), etc.
E. Active business. Theoretically an IRA can operate a business. Of course the business’s
income would be taxable as UBTI; see And the operating business could legally
get into the IRA only by being purchased (or started) with cash that had been legally
contributed to the IRA (or proceeds of investments arising from legal cash contributions);
see A). Also, to avoid prohibited transaction problems , it would appear
that neither the IRA owner or any member of his family could work for the business; the
only possible limited exception to that would be that it might be permissible for the IRA
owner to perform “management” services without compensation. (Note: Despite
occasional statements in IRS Publications that a prohibited transaction will arise if the IRA
owner is paid “unreasonable” compensation from his IRA, it is actually the case that the
payment of any compensation to the IRA owner from the IRA would be a prohibited
transaction.) And obviously there would be prohibited transaction concerns regarding any
transaction between the IRA-owned business and the IRA owner or any of his relatives or
entities owned by any of them. With so many risks and limitations, it seems not advisable
to operate a business inside an IRA.
8.1.06 IRAs and prohibited transactions