Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  415 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 415 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 9: Distributions Before Age 59 ½

415

Note that the ending date of the five years is not simply the date of the fifth year’s payment.

The five years ends on the

fifth anniversary of the first payment. Arnold

, 111 T.C. No. 250 (1998).

9.3.03

Exceptions for death or disability

If the series is modified “by reason of death or disability” there is no penalty.

§ 72(t)(4)(A) .

Presumably death

automatically

ends the requirement of continuing the series, since death benefits

are exempt from the penalty;

¶ 9.4.01 .

Presumably the same is true of a total disability that justifies

penalty-free distributions; see

¶ 9.4.02 .

Whether a modification that was “caused by” any lesser

disability would escape the penalty remains to be seen.

9.3.04

Changing to RMD method after the SOSEPP commences

One type of change in the series is specifically permitted: Changing to the RMD method”

of computing the payments

( ¶ 9.2.05 (

A)) will not be considered a modification. Rev. Rul. 2002-

62 allows a participant using the annuitization or amortization method to change (permanently) to

the RMD method; see § 2.03(b) of the Rev. Rul. for details on making this switch.

Because the RMD method requires annual revaluation of the account balance, a downturn

in the account value will translate, under the RMD method, into a reduction in the subsequent

year’s payment. Thus, the series payments will shrink along with the account value and the account

will never run dry. Similarly, if the investments perform substantially better than the growth

assumption used in designing the SOSEPP

( ¶ 9.2.10 )

, switching to the RMD method allows the

participant to increase his payments to capture some of that investment growth.

9.3.05

When taking an extra payment is not a modification

Generally, taking an “extra” payment out of your IRA over and above the prescribed

SOSEPP payments would be considered a modification of the series (see

¶ 9.3.07 (

B)), but not

necessarily always.

A.

Qualified hurricane distributions.

Taking a qualified hurricane distribution

( ¶ 9.4.13 )

over and above the participant’s SOSEPP payments is not a modification of the SOSEPP.

Notice 2005-92 , I.R.B. 2005-51 ,

Section 4(H).

B.

Other payments that qualify for another exception.

If the extra distribution qualifies for

some other penalty exception, the extra payment is not a modification of the SOSEPP,

according to G.T. Benz, Dec. 7,810, 132 TC 15 (5/11/09).

C.

Administrative error.

The IRS generally will rule that there is no modification when a

change in the SOSEPP is caused by an administrative action or error of the SOSEPP-paying

financial institution; se

e ¶ 9.3.06 (

A), (E). However, there is no Revenue Ruling, regulation,

or other authority supporting this as a general exception, leaving participants with the

unpleasant choice of either applying for their own ruling (expensive) or relying on other

peoples’ PLRs (with attendant uncertainty).

9.3.06

What other changes do NOT constitute a modification?

Converting a SOSEPP-supporting account to a Roth IRA does not constitute a

modification; see

¶ 8.3.03

for details. The following other types of changes in a SOSEPP have