Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  435 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 435 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 10: RMD Rules for “Annuitized” Plans

435

following

year. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-1(c). That final deadline for the first year’s RMD is call

the

Required Beginning Date

or

RBD

.

§ 401(a)(9)(C) ;

se

e ¶ 10.2.07 .

Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-6 ,

A-1(d), provides two methods whereby a DB plan can compute the

nonrollable RMD portion” of a lump sum distribution.

Method #1:

Under Method #1, you compute the RMD portion using the DC plan RMD rules (see

¶ 10.1.05 )

, “pretending” that the lump sum distribution the employee receives is the prior year-end

balance.

Method #2:

Method #2 is more complicated. Essentially you treat one year’s worth of pension

payments as the RMD for the first year. The regulation permits “expressing the employee’s benefit

as an annuity that would satisfy” the RMD regulations (apparently

any

annuity that would satisfy

the RMD regulations), beginning as of the first day of the Distribution Year for which the RMD

is being determined. Reg

. § 1.401(a)(9)-6 ,

A-1(d)(2).

Which method is better? Method #1 is easier to calculate, and will always produce a smaller

RMD. It seems strange to have a “required minimum” distribution that could be any one of several

different possible amounts.

Suppose the participant postpones taking her benefits until her Required Beginning Date

(RBD), then receives a lump sum distribution on the RBD. How much of that distribution is treated

as a nonrollable RMD? The regulation gives us the same two methods, but in this case we must

compute two years’ worth of RMDs, since the year of the RBD is actually the second Distribution

Year.

Method #1:

This is tricky! We must compute two years’ worth of RMDs, using the “pretend” DC

plan method. That means there are two different divisors, one for the first Distribution Year (the

year the participant reached age 70½) and one for the second year (the year he reached age 71½).

But the pretend “prior year-end balance” we use for both these computations is the same, the

amount of the lump sum distribution. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-6 ,

A-1(d)(1).

Any distributions the participant had received in the first Distribution Year would reduce

the amount of the RMD for the “first Distribution Year” portion of the second Distribution Year

RMD.

Method #2:

If the plan uses this method it would treat two years’ worth of annuity payments as

the RMD for the second Distribution Year. The “annuity payments” for this purpose would be

based on an annuity that started on the first day of the first Distribution Year.

10.2.09

If participant’s ASD is prior to the RBD

If an employee retires before age 70½, at, say, age 65, and starts receiving his pension then,

he and the annuity issuer are making their insurance bargain irrevocably at that time. This situation

poses another contrast to the DC plan situation, and again required the IRS to come up with

different rules for DB plans.

Under a DC plan, any distributions the participant takes prior to his first Distribution Year

are irrelevant to the RMD rules. The DC rules kick into action during the first Distribution Year