Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  460 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 460 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

460

Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

rates “if the life insurance protection covers more than one life.” Insurance experts do not

find this computation difficult, despite the absence of an official table.

C.

Prohibited transaction meets transfer-for-value.

Attempting to sell a second-to-die

policy to the participant creates a dilemma. The Department of Labor has indicated that

PTE 92-6

( ¶ 11.3.05 )

applies to second-to-die insurance policies on the life of the employee

and his/her spouse as well as to single life policies on the life of the employee. PTE 92-6

exempts the plan’s sale of a life insurance policy from the PT rules provided that (among

other conditions) the sale is made

to the participant or beneficiary

. This would

not

permit

a sale of the policy to both the participant

and the spouse

; the spouse is not the beneficiary

of the policy (because it is a policy on her own life) nor is she the participant. However, if

the participant

alone

purchases the second-to-die policy, this may be considered only partly

a sale “to the insured” for purposes of the transfer-for-value rule

( ¶ 11.4.02 )

, because the

policy insures

both

spouses. Thus, it may be necessary to seek a DOL PT exemption for

such a sale.

11.4.04

Reasons to buy life insurance inside the plan

Here are some reasons why people buy life insurance inside a retirement plan. “

indicates a good reason. “

” indicates a less good reason.

A.

Client uninsurable.

The client is rated or uninsurable, and wants to buy insurance, and

there is a policy available through the plan that the client can purchase without evidence of

insurability.

B.

Favorable group policy available through plan.

The plan may have a negotiated group

insurance rate that is lower than the rate the participant would have to pay if he bought the

insurance outside the plan.

C.

Increase defined benefit plan contribution.

It is possible in some cases that the

purchase of insurance, as an incidental death benefit, could increase permitted

contributions to a defined benefit (DB) plan (or help absorb some funds in an overfunded

DB plan). See McFadden, J.J., and Leimberg, S.R., “Fully Insured 412(I) Pension Plans

Offer Simplicity and Low Risk,” 30

Estate Planning

4, p. 155 (April 2003).

D.

Only available money is in the plan.

The client needs life insurance but has no money

to pay for it outside the retirement plan. In this case, however, first consider, instead, taking

some money out of the plan to buy the insurance. Unless the client cannot get money out

of the plan (due to unacceptable level of tax on plan distributions, creditor or marital

problems, or because the plan doesn’t permit it), the purchase of insurance outside the plan

may be more tax-effective.

E.

Minimize tax on plan distributions.

A discredited planning strategy involved pouring

plan assets into a life insurance policy, which (due to inflated surrender charges and other

valuation gimmicks) had a cash value that was much less than the amount the participant

had invested. The policy would then be distributed or sold to the participant at the depressed