Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  134 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 134 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

134

WITTY, WISE AND OTHERWISE.

A man can hardly expect to L>ecorne a good all-rouuu bar te11<.ler who works

a lifetime in one house, because be gets into one rut and goes to sleep there, as

it were.

'l'here is also a great deal of luck attending the success of some popular

bai;tenders; some climb up rapidly because they begin in a house that allows

the boys the privilege of ma king friends, while others a re broke in under a

system whereby one cannot popularize himself under any circumstances. Some

bluff their way along on no pair, with little actual knowledge, and others with

unlimited experience a nd ability haven't enough confidence or are too unfortu–

nate · to succeed.

lt's a funny game any way you look at it, but the main requisite to success

is common sense a nd lots of

it.

'

According to the old hieroglyphic inscriptions and papyrus found in Egypt,

prohibitive agitation is at least four thousand years old.

As early as the year 2,000

B.

C. the Egyptian people were convulsed

because certain hig h-handed persons attempted to abolish the beer shops (the

Egyptian beer or "hek" was brewed from barley without hops) .

So the prohibition propaganda is no new thing. History is full of it.

There is nothing desirable in prohibition per se, but only as a means to

temperance, and nothing shows the futility of such agitation so well as a

study of its history as far back as you may care to trace it-always chimerical,

always impracticable, always impossible I The development of a taste for

milder beverages is succeeding where prohibition has always failed-that is,

is advancing the cause of rational temperance.

The recent heavy increases in the consumption of beer which contains a

very slight percentage of alcohol (much less than cider, by the way) is one of

the most hopeful temperance indications of the times.

Compulsory interference with generalized food customs beyond certain

reasonable limits must have disastrous consequences, and any attempt to sup–

press the use of alco

0

hol in this .country would,

I

believe, lead to an enormous

extension of the drug babit.-already deplorably prevalent-which, being prac–

ticed in secret and outside social restraints, is more insidious in its inroads

and more detrimental in its effects tha n indulgence in wine, beer or spirits.

A large majority of the medical profession is,

I

f eel sure, convinced of

the value of alcohol in the treatment of disease, and prescribe it with caution

and discrimination in suitable cases and as occasion requires. But the dis·

sentients are more noisy and aggressive, as disseutients are wont to be, than·

the adherent!!.-of the established faith, and so erroneous notions have got about

as to the attitude of the medical men toward the alcohol question.

It

seemed

time to enter a caveat.

Medica l men are the steadfast friends of temperance and have done much

to promote it. They note with satisfaction the diminished consumption of