Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  165 / 648 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 165 / 648 Next Page
Page Background

Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites

Final report

163

agreement of criteria and mechanisms for handling changes;

responsibility for hazard identification and risk assessment of changes;

identifying key safety performance indicators.

161 The extent to which the guidance needs to be applied is a function of the risk associated with

the shared activities. Thus, before developing SMS interfacing arrangements, a risk assessment

must be undertaken by the parties involved. This may be a simple matter of making a judgement

about the degree of hazard and duration of activity.

162 It would seem to be potentially useful (with minor tailoring) for onshore application, particularly

where a significant element of core business activity is contracted out (eg maintenance).

Summary

163 Dutyholders should ensure that there is a suitable policy and procedure for managing

organisational changes.

164 Dutyholders should ensure that there is a suitable policy and procedure for retention of

corporate memory.

165 Dutyholders should ensure that they retain adequate technical competence and ‘intelligent

customer’ capability when work impacting on the control of major accident hazards is outsourced

or contractorised.

166 Dutyholders should ensure that suitable arrangements are in place for management and

monitoring of contractor activities.

167 Dutyholders should ensure that in addition to retaining intelligent customer capability, they

consider using industry guidance for interfacing safety management systems where core business

is contracted out.

168 HSE should consider reviewing its guidance

Managing contractors

HSG159 to ensure that

it is appropriate for major hazard sites and consistent with other relevant guidance (eg CHIS7) in

terms of requirements to maintain ‘intelligent customer’ capability. Guidance on SMS interfacing

between clients and contractors should also be considered.

Management of plant and process changes

169 Experience (for example the Flixborough disaster in 1974) has shown management of change

(MOC) to be an essential factor in the prevention and control of major accidents. This section

discusses plant and process changes. Management of organisational change is discussed under

‘Organisational change and management of contractors’ in this appendix.

170 Dutyholders should adopt and implement management procedures for planning and control

of all changes in plant, processes and process variables, materials, equipment, procedures,

software, design or external circumstances which are capable of affecting the control of major

accident hazards.

171 This approach should cover permanent, temporary, and urgent operational changes,

including control of overrides/inhibits, as well as changes to the management arrangements

themselves (see L111).

Guidance

172

Guide to the COMAH Regulations

L111 summarises the range of changes that should be

subject to management of change control procedures.